[Bug gold/11025] gold failed to build on 32bit hosts

2009-11-26 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
-- What|Removed |Added CC||espindola at google dot com http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11025 --- You are receiving th

[Bug gold/11025] New: gold failed to build on 32bit hosts

2009-11-26 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
On Linux/ia32, I got cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors /net/gnu-6/export/linux/src/binutils/binutils/gold/incremental-dump.cc: In function ‘int main(int, char**)’: /net/gnu-6/export/linux/src/binutils/binutils/gold/incremental-dump.cc:151: warning: format ‘%ld’ expects type ‘long int’, but

[Bug binutils/10964] objdump disassembles "lpm rX, Z" wrongly

2009-11-26 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-11-26 13:56 --- Hi Elrond, > So you suggest, that this is a bug in the debian packaging? I would have to say yes, although it does seem rather strange. Perhaps you could try downloading a snapshot of the current development sou

[Bug ld/10956] Missing --no-relax option

2009-11-26 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-11-26 13:49 --- Hi Richard, > Why rename it to "target_specific_optimizations"? It's still relaxation. Because for some targets the command line option is used to enable other optimizations, not just relaxation. I have checked

[Bug ld/10956] Missing --no-relax option

2009-11-26 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-26 13:45 --- Subject: Bug 10956 CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: ni...@sourceware.org2009-11-26 13:45:26 Modified files: ld : ChangeLog ld.h ld.texinfo ldlang.c ld