--- Additional Comments From robert dot wohlrab at gmx dot de 2009-11-19
16:53 ---
Thanks for your fast reply. All your information was forwarded to the actual
maintainer of the packages. And yes, the extra space was the problem with
relro... haven't seen that there is a extra space. It
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-19
14:07 ---
Subject: Bug 10924
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: ni...@sourceware.org2009-11-19 14:07:11
Modified files:
opcodes: ChangeLog arm-dis.c
gas/test
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-11-19 14:03
---
Hi Guys,
Right - I have checked in the third patch in this series. This restores the
default behaviour of not printing a zero offset if it is used in Immediate
Offset addressing mode. This also resovles the gr
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-11-19 14:01
---
Created an attachment (id=4396)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4396&action=view)
Do not prnt zero offset for Immediate Offset addressing
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?i
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-11-19 11:15
---
Hi Chris,
> Just to make sure we're clearmy understanding of my ARM manual is that
> we need to specify #0 just like any other number.
Not quite. There is one form of Addressing Mode 3 where the #0 is optio
--- Additional Comments From robert dot wohlrab at gmx dot de 2009-11-19
10:57 ---
According to http://bugs.debian.org/556951 it is a Debian specific eglibc bug.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10982
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on t
--- Additional Comments From YLitvinenko at astana dot oilfield dot slb dot
com 2009-11-19 08:41 ---
Created an attachment (id=4395)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4395&action=view)
output from gcc-4.4.2 and ld version 2.20
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/s
--- Additional Comments From YLitvinenko at astana dot oilfield dot slb dot
com 2009-11-19 08:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=4394)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4394&action=view)
object file from gcc-4.4.2
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
--- Additional Comments From YLitvinenko at astana dot oilfield dot slb dot
com 2009-11-19 08:37 ---
I repeated the test (see test script between lines " cut here ")
using gcc-4.4.2.
Result the same.
cut here -
SRC=test_binutils.c
OBJ=test_binutils.o
OPT="/usr/lib
