FYI, in compiling gas with binutils-2.20, I get the following error,
which then aborts the build:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../gas -I. -I../../gas -I../bfd
-I../../gas/config -I../../gas/../include -I../../gas/..
-I../../gas/../bfd
-DLOCALEDIR="\"//opt/ltrx/ixp42x/host/usr/share/locale\""
--- Additional Comments From vapier at gentoo dot org 2009-10-16 21:41
---
i have no idea. i'm not an openssl expert let alone x86 assembly. guess i'll
just file a bug report upstream and let them handle it.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10636
--- You are r
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||vincent dot riviere at
||freesbee dot fr
http://sourceware.org/
I can't get Interix gcc 3.3 get pass this due to warning settings
(info is unused)
The solution it's a bit ugly, my gcc knowledge could be better.
Maybe you can come up with something more elegant?
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/binutils
--- Additional Comments From vincent dot riviere at freesbee dot fr
2009-10-16 20:58 ---
The new testcase copy-4 fails on target m68k-netbsd (using a.out).
The test seems to be valid, maybe the fix didn't work for a.out objects.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9933
variable declared inside code block.
Not all compilers are happy about it
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/binutils/dlltool.c,v
retrieving revision 1.93
diff -w -b -B -u -p -r1.93 dlltool.c
--- dlltool.c 4 Sep 2009 01:22:18 - 1.
--- Additional Comments From jerker dot back at gmail dot com 2009-10-16
20:29 ---
Problem gone in both 64bit and 32bit builds
Thanks
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10785
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or a
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-16
17:57 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-16
16:55 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-16
16:39 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> i'm pretty sure they should all be unsigned
How does code work since hardware treats them as signed for calculation?
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10636
-
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-16
16:33 ---
Subject: Bug 10775
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: h...@sourceware.org 2009-10-16 16:33:17
Modified files:
gas: ChangeLog
gas/doc: c
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-16
16:30 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> The following information is lacking from the GAS manual:
>
> In node (as.info)i386-Mnemonics, add at the end of 9.13.4,
>
> In 64-bit mode, `movabs' is the form of the mov instr
--- Additional Comments From vapier at gentoo dot org 2009-10-16 16:19
---
i'm pretty sure they should all be unsigned
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10636
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching som
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-16
15:36 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> thanks, just wanted to make sure the issue was with the assembly code
>
> i'm not terribly great with x86 assembly. could you suggest a fix ? every
> statement that is failing (
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-10-16 15:20
---
Hi Dmitry,
Thanks for the patch - I have applied it along with an addition to the ld/NEWS
file mentioning the new feature and the ld/ld.texinfo file describing the new
command line option.
Cheers
Nick
--
--- Additional Comments From vapier at gentoo dot org 2009-10-16 15:11
---
thanks, just wanted to make sure the issue was with the assembly code
i'm not terribly great with x86 assembly. could you suggest a fix ? every
statement that is failing (44 of them) are exactly the same form b
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-10-16 14:09
---
Hi Jerker,
Thanks for reporting this problem and for providing a patch. I have checked
it in along with the following changelog entry.
Cheers
Nick
binutils/ChangeLog
2009-10-16 Jerker Bäck
PR 107
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-16
14:09 ---
Subject: Bug 10764
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: ni...@sourceware.org2009-10-16 14:08:58
Modified files:
binutils : ChangeLog Makefile.am Makefile.in
L
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-10-16 14:03
---
Hi Yann,
Thanks for the patch. I have now applied it to the sources along with this
changelog entry.
Cheers
Nick
binutils/ChangeLog
2009-10-16 Yann Droneaud
PR 10768
* dlltool.c (bfd_get
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-16
14:03 ---
Subject: Bug 10768
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: ni...@sourceware.org2009-10-16 14:02:55
Modified files:
binutils : ChangeLog dlltool.c
Log message:
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-16
13:35 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> so i guess it's expected that openssl will no longer assemble with this
> change ?
>
> 41:leal3614090360(%rax,%r10,1),%eax
> 50:leal3905402710(%rdx,%r10,1),%edx
>
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-16
10:03 ---
Subject: Bug 10785
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Branch: binutils-2_20-branch
Changes by: ging...@sourceware.org 2009-10-16 10:02:44
Modified files:
bfd:
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2009-10-16
07:51 ---
Fixed
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-16
07:15 ---
Subject: Bug 10785
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: amo...@sourceware.org 2009-10-16 07:14:44
Modified files:
bfd: ChangeLog opncls.c coff-alpha.c peico
--- Additional Comments From vapier at gentoo dot org 2009-10-16 06:45
---
so i guess it's expected that openssl will no longer assemble with this change ?
make[3]: Entering directory
`/var/tmp/portage/dev-libs/openssl-0.9.8k-r1/work/openssl-0.9.8k/crypto/md5'
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -I
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2009-10-16
07:10 ---
Well, peicode.h alloc was OK until
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-07/msg00255.html came along :-(
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10785
--- You are receiving this mail be
26 matches
Mail list logo
