[Bug binutils/9749] The section is put not in order

--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-20 22:43 --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #8) > > Can you put ".section .setup,"ax",@progbits" in arch/i386/multiboot.S? > > It works. But, despite this is more correct way of handling it, why? That

[Bug binutils/9749] The section is put not in order

--- Additional Comments From uzytkownik2 at gmail dot com 2009-01-20 22:36 --- (In reply to comment #8) > Can you put ".section .setup,"ax",@progbits" in arch/i386/multiboot.S? It works. But, despite this is more correct way of handling it, why? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/sho

[Bug binutils/9749] The section is put not in order

--- Additional Comments From uzytkownik2 at gmail dot com 2009-01-20 22:31 --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #0) > > I'm not quite sure if it is a bug or feature request (at least on mailong > > list > > it was pointed out as bug). I try to produce an ELF in multiboot

[Bug binutils/9749] The section is put not in order

--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-20 22:25 --- Can you put ".section .setup,"ax",@progbits" in arch/i386/multiboot.S? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9749 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list

[Bug binutils/9749] The section is put not in order

--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-20 22:18 --- (In reply to comment #0) > I'm not quite sure if it is a bug or feature request (at least on mailong list > it was pointed out as bug). I try to produce an ELF in multiboot format - > therefore the setup sec

[Bug binutils/9766] "--kill-at" results in wrong export names

--- Additional Comments From Christoph at ApiViewer dot de 2009-01-20 17:06 --- it should check if a number follows as well otherwise functions names like "?...@yapaxi@Z" would be destroyed as well (like the ones in msvcrt.dll) -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9766

[Bug binutils/9766] "--kill-at" results in wrong export names

--- Additional Comments From Christoph at ApiViewer dot de 2009-01-20 15:52 --- (In reply to comment #0) > "funct...@2@4" will result in "Function" instead of "funct...@2" when > --kill-at > is used > > I only had a quick look at the sources - when I see this correct strchr in > dlltoo

[Bug binutils/9749] The section is put not in order

--- Additional Comments From uzytkownik2 at gmail dot com 2009-01-20 15:13 --- Created an attachment (id=3675) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3675&action=view) The test case I believed so much github is intelligent enought to include a submodules I hadn't checked

[Bug binutils/9749] The section is put not in order

--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-20 15:01 --- (In reply to comment #4) > It was under the given link (download->tar): > http://github.com/uzytkownik/nios/tarball/master > > Simple make should compile it. nios is the resulting file. It won't compile. I

--killat removes too much

Hi! I have to export function like "funct...@2" - but when I specify "funct...@2@4" in the .def file and run dlltool with --killat I get "Function" instead of "funct...@2". I only had a quick look at dlltool sources so far but I think strchr in xlate should be replaced with strrchr to fix thi

[Bug binutils/9766] New: "--kill-at" results in wrong export names

"funct...@2@4" will result in "Function" instead of "funct...@2" when --kill-at is used I only had a quick look at the sources - when I see this correct strchr in dlltoold.c/xlate should be changed to strrchr. -- Summary: "--kill-at" results in wrong export names Product: b

[Bug binutils/9749] The section is put not in order

--- Additional Comments From uzytkownik2 at gmail dot com 2009-01-20 12:56 --- It was under the given link (download->tar): http://github.com/uzytkownik/nios/tarball/master Simple make should compile it. nios is the resulting file. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9