[Bug ld/6962] New: ld fails in coffcode.h line 842 in handle_COMDAT

2008-10-14 Thread JeanMarie dot Chudyba at samcef dot com
g++ -L"C:\users\BossV70\CPPProject\Debug" -Wl,--add-stdcall-alias -shared -o"CPPWrapperProject.dll" ./wrappercode.o -lCPPProject /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/3.4.4/../../../../i686-pc-cygwin/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.18.50.20080625 internal error, aborting at /netrel/src/binutils-20080624-2/bf

[Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols

2008-10-14 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-10-14 11:41 --- (In reply to comment #14) > Subject: Re: binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so > due to missing symbols > > > I think Nick's patch is wrong. :-( > > Doh! > > > We don't ever build a shared libibe

[Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols

2008-10-14 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-10-14 08:20 --- Subject: Re: binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so dueto missing symbols > I think Nick's patch is wrong. :-( Doh! > We don't ever build a shared libiberty, Why not ? Wouldn't it be easy to solve t

Re: [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols

2008-10-14 Thread Nick Clifton
I think Nick's patch is wrong. :-( Doh! We don't ever build a shared libiberty, Why not ? Wouldn't it be easy to solve this problem if we did build a shared libiberty ? ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/