[Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols

2008-10-03 Thread ps dot m at gmx dot net
--- Additional Comments From ps dot m at gmx dot net 2008-10-03 18:29 --- Subject: Re: binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols I used a cross development script for this, it does something like mkdir build; cd build; LDFLAGS="-Wl,-z,defs" ../binutils-2.18/con

[Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols

2008-10-03 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-10-03 15:34 --- Hi Peter, I have been trying to reproduce this problem but failing. Please could you show me a step-by-step guide as to how you made it happen ? Cheers Nick -- What|Removed

[Bug ld/6931] COMDAT group is broken

2008-10-03 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-10-03 15:16 --- It still isn't right: bash-3.2$ cat /export/gnu/src/binutils/binutils/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/group.s .section .text.foo,"axG",%progbits,foo_group,comdat .global foo foo: .wo

[Bug gas/6926] Macro number feature \@ conflicting with @ in line_separator_chars

2008-10-03 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-10-03 15:14 --- Hi Hans-Peter, > Would you mind if I add a specific gas-testcase for \@ in a section directive > and elsewhere? Please do. > Come to think of it, that test shows that the \@ handling in .section is the > excepti

[Bug gas/6926] Macro number feature \@ conflicting with @ in line_separator_chars

2008-10-03 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-10-03 15:10 --- Created an attachment (id=2980) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2980&action=view) Revised patch to specially target macros -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug ld/6931] COMDAT group is broken

2008-10-03 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2008-10-03 10:11 --- http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2008-10/msg00013.html http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-10/msg00030.html HJ, please commit the new tests. -- What|Removed |A

[Bug ld/6938] ld: failure depending on order of -l libs

2008-10-03 Thread dmitry at karasik dot eu dot org
--- Additional Comments From dmitry at karasik dot eu dot org 2008-10-03 08:45 --- That's what I needed, thanks! -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug ld/6938] ld: failure depending on order of -l libs

2008-10-03 Thread brian at dessent dot net
--- Additional Comments From brian at dessent dot net 2008-10-03 08:37 --- Subject: Re: ld: failure depending on order of -l libs There is a brief explanation in the manual in the section describing --start-group/--end-group. This behavior is not unique to GNU ld, I'm pretty sure if y

[Bug gas/6926] Macro number feature \@ conflicting with @ in line_separator_chars

2008-10-03 Thread hp at sourceware dot org
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2008-10-03 06:24 --- (In reply to comment #4) > gas/cris/macroat Come to think of it, that test shows that the \@ handling in .section is the exception, as TRT already happens elsewhere. Please reconsider doing it always instead of h