On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 07:19:15AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> I think it is another form of
>
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5543
>
> We fixed it in generic assembler. If we want to fix this
> one in x86 backend, should we revert the fix for PR 5543?
It's really a result of md_reg
--- Additional Comments From dj at redhat dot com 2008-09-18 16:45 ---
Subject: Re: '% found after symbol for non-H-TICK-HEX tokens
The warning is for people who use the ' character without realizing
exactly how it will work. It does not do what most people expect,
unless they've care
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 4:44 AM, Nick Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Per, Hi H.J.,
>
> H.J. - this email is in response to a x86 assembler bug report from Per that
> was posted here:
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2008-09/msg6.html
>
> I have a patch to fix the pro
--- Additional Comments From rep dot dot dot nop at gmail dot com
2008-09-18 16:13 ---
The patch disables the warning for me, yes.
Shouldn't the warning only be issued if (the arch supports it and the param was
given and) "H'" was seen as opposed to any occurance of "'"?
thanks,
--
Hi Per, Hi H.J.,
H.J. - this email is in response to a x86 assembler bug report from Per
that was posted here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2008-09/msg6.html
I have a patch to fix the problem (attached) but I am not sure if you
will like it. Possibly the error should
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-09-18 07:54
---
Hi Bernhard,
Please could you try out the uploaded patch. I think that it will resolve the
issue for you. It makes two changes - the warning message about the tick syntax
is now only issued if the target suppo
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-09-18 07:52
---
Created an attachment (id=2956)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2956&action=view)
Only enable tick warning message when tick syntax is supported. Do not use a
line number of 0 in warning mes
