Hi Nick,
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> > We built the libxvtmapi.a ourselves. Yes, I've tried deleting it and
> > rebuilding but I still get the file format not recognized error message.
> >
> > The build procedure seems to work fine otherwise, though there are
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-08-22
22:06 ---
I guess it is OK since libfoo.so should be linked with libbar.so.
--
What|Removed |Added
[EMAIL PROTECTED] needed-5]$ cat foo.c
extern void bar ();
void
foo ()
{
bar ();
}
[EMAIL PROTECTED] needed-5]$ cat bar.c
void
bar ()
{
}
[EMAIL PROTECTED] needed-5]$ cat main.c
extern void foo ();
int
main ()
{
foo ();
return 0;
}
[EMAIL PROTECTED] needed-5]$ make foo
gcc -O -g -c -o ma
Hi Roger,
We built the libxvtmapi.a ourselves. Yes, I've tried deleting it and
rebuilding but I still get the file format not recognized error message.
The build procedure seems to work fine otherwise, though there are some
warning messages. That said, I haven't seen any warning messages
Hi Keith,
I am building I configured binutils-2.17
Note: The 2.18 sources were released a while ago now...
make check failed. The relevant lines are
FAIL: TLS -fpic -shared
FAIL: TLS -fpic and -fno-pic exec
FAIL: TLS -fpic and -fno-pic exec -relax
FAIL: ld-elf/64ksec
FAIL: vers24a
FAIL: vers
Hi Sebastien,
I created a pragma to change the locality of data a in my code.
When I put "#pragma foo a" in file1.c and file2.c, I got the good result:
2.00 0x80900850
But if it is only in file1.c, the result is
0.00 0x0.
I'm using Binutils 2.18.
Which part of the code I need to modify?
--- Additional Comments From jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com
2008-08-22 08:35 ---
Jakub's fix for the Comment 8 and Comment 9 has been committed with a testcase:
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-08/msg00188.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2008-08/msg00127.html
