Re: Build error with binutils 2.18: requires makeinfo but shouldn't

On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 16:57 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > For 2.18, it's revision 1.1.18.1 of elf.texi. I had to go into the > Attic to find it. Cvsweb does not appear to do The Right Thing for > files that do not exist on trunk. Oh blerg. OK, thanks. Still and all, it's something that wou

Re: Build error with binutils 2.18: requires makeinfo but shouldn't

On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 11:59 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > The release branch has the generated files in it. This is how > binutils releases have traditionally been managed. It's the snapshots > before the final release that cause this problem. Hi Daniel; I don't think this is true, at least

Re: Build error with binutils 2.18: requires makeinfo but shouldn't

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 06:51:22PM -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > Still and all, it's something that would be great to have fixed in the > official release distributions; if for no other reason than it would > save you guys a lot of bug reports about problems with makeinfo (in > researching this bug I

Re: Build error with binutils 2.18: requires makeinfo but shouldn't

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 02:19:36PM -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 11:59 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > The release branch has the generated files in it. This is how > > binutils releases have traditionally been managed. It's the snapshots > > before the final release that c

[Bug binutils/6526] Building for interix 3.5 requires _ALL_SOURCE defined

--- Additional Comments From Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de 2008-06-23 19:09 --- (In reply to comment #2) > I'm not sure. Maybe Ralf knows? Not sure if you're addressing me (but if you are, please Cc: me, thanks). FWIW, the thread in question is