--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-03-10
03:43 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I think you need to qualify what you say. It is clearly true that the
> st_shndx
> field of a symbol is not a pure section index. Any value above LORESERVE is
> indeed reserved.
--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2008-03-10 03:00 ---
I think you need to qualify what you say. It is clearly true that the st_shndx
field of a symbol is not a pure section index. Any value above LORESERVE is
indeed reserved. The ELF ABI defines what to do for a symbol
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-03-10
02:24 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> You seem to be trying to say that section indexes between SHN_LORESERVE and
> SHN_HIRESERVE are not to be used. However, there is no support for that in
> the
> ELF spec. And it
--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2008-03-10 01:24 ---
You seem to be trying to say that section indexes between SHN_LORESERVE and
SHN_HIRESERVE are not to be used. However, there is no support for that in the
ELF spec. And it is not required to make everything work.
Als
