[Bug binutils/5487] linking with dllwrap causes crash

2007-12-16 Thread ambro at b4ever dot net
-- What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5487 --- You are receiving this ma

[Bug binutils/5487] linking with dllwrap causes crash

2007-12-16 Thread ambro at b4ever dot net
--- Additional Comments From ambro at b4ever dot net 2007-12-16 22:32 --- That was just after 'dllwrap', before 'dlltool' -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5487 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching s

[Bug binutils/5487] linking with dllwrap causes crash

2007-12-16 Thread ambro at b4ever dot net
--- Additional Comments From ambro at b4ever dot net 2007-12-16 22:30 --- Created an attachment (id=2140) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2140&action=view) libwine.dll linked with broken binutils and one commit before -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug

[Bug binutils/5487] linking with dllwrap causes crash

2007-12-16 Thread ambro at b4ever dot net
--- Additional Comments From ambro at b4ever dot net 2007-12-16 22:15 --- I've been doing bisecting and found out this commit causes the regression: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2007-01/msg00093.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5487 --- You are re

[Bug binutils/5488] New: strip doesn't handle PT_NOTE segment properly

2007-12-16 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
bash-3.2$ cat note-2.s .globl _entry .text _entry: .byte 0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 .section .foo,"awx",%progbits .byte 0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 .section .note,"",%note .byte 0 bash-3.2$ cat note-2.t ENTRY(_entry) PHDRS { data PT

[Bug binutils/5487] New: linking with dllwrap causes crash

2007-12-16 Thread ambro at b4ever dot net
There is a bug in binutils 2.18 and current cvs about linking DLLs. It causes some crash in Wine DDLs. See http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10783 I tested several binutils versions and it turned out the bug is not present in 2.17, but present in 2.17.50, up to current cvs. What's interestin