[Bug ld/4715] gld fails to link Solaris 10/x86 libnsl.so

--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-26 02:53 --- 2.18 should work. -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug binutils/4989] [2.18 regression] build failure on m68k-linux-gnu

--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2007-09-25 17:21 --- linux-2.6/include/asm-m68k/user.h:#define NBPG 4096 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4989 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching

[Bug binutils/4989] [2.18 regression] build failure on m68k-linux-gnu

--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-09-25 16:28 --- Subject: Re: New: [2.18 regression] build failure on m68k-linux-gnu Hi Doko, > 2.18 fails to build on m68k-linux-gnu: > libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../bfd -I. -DTRAD_CORE -I. > -I../../bfd

Re: [Bug binutils/4989] New: [2.18 regression] build failure on m68k-linux-gnu

Hi Doko, 2.18 fails to build on m68k-linux-gnu: libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../bfd -I. -DTRAD_CORE -I. -I../../bfd -I../../bfd/../include -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Werror -g -O2 -c ../../bfd/trad-core.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/trad-core.o ../../bfd/t

Re: Gprof cycle member list sorting bug

Hi Robert, In cg_print.c:sort_members gprof loses a members of the linked list when sorting! The bug is at cg_print.c:169 (in current HEAD). The guard of the outer for loop should be just 'doing' not 'doing && doing->cg.cyc.next'. Thank you for reporting this bug. I have checked in your patch

Re: [patch] MAINTAINERS typo

Hi Thien-Thi, Thanks for pointing this out. I have checked in your patch along with this ChangeLog entry. Cheers Nick binutils/ChangeLog 2007-09-25 Thien-Thi Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * MAINTAINERS: Fix typo. ___ bug-binutils mail

[patch] MAINTAINERS typo

--- MAINTAINERS~ 2006-04-10 05:59:57.0 +0200 +++ MAINTAINERS 2007-09-25 13:24:02.0 +0200 @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ binutils-tgc-fm -A data stamp is not required as part of the name field, but some +A date stamp is not required as part of the name field, but some organizations like

[Bug binutils/5059] absolute objcopy not working on amd64?

--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-25 13:52 --- (In reply to comment #9) > need to rebuild all gcc toolchain again, something is wrong.. > Your system is corrupted. Binutils 2.18 should have no problems on Linux/x86-64. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_b