[Bug binutils/4791] etc/standards.texi: @strong{Note...} produces a spurious cross-reference in Info

2007-08-01 Thread wilson at specifix dot com
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifix dot com 2007-08-02 00:00 --- Subject: Re: etc/standards.texi: @strong{Note...} produces a spurious cross-reference in Info On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 23:10 +, nightstrike at gmail dot com wrote: > I didn't realize there was the hie

Re: [Bug binutils/4791] etc/standards.texi: @strong{Note...} produces a spurious cross-reference in Info

2007-08-01 Thread Jim Wilson
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 23:10 +, nightstrike at gmail dot com wrote: > I didn't realize there was the hierarchy you describe. Where is the cvs > repository for the "upstream"? The project page is here http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnustandards You can get to the cvs repository for this p

[Bug binutils/4791] etc/standards.texi: @strong{Note...} produces a spurious cross-reference in Info

2007-08-01 Thread nightstrike at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From nightstrike at gmail dot com 2007-08-01 23:10 --- (In reply to comment #4) > Subject: Re: etc/standards.texi: @strong{Note...} > produces a spurious cross-reference in Info > > On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 16:05 +, nightstrike at gmail dot com wrote: > >

[Bug ld/4877] New: FAIL: .secrel32

2007-08-01 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
This patch http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-07/msg00365.html causes FAIL: .secrel32 for x86_64-mingw32 hosted on Linux/x86-64. -- Summary: FAIL: .secrel32 Product: binutils Version: 2.18 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug ld/4694] ld corrupts a.out text sections

2007-08-01 Thread vincent dot riviere at freesbee dot fr
--- Additional Comments From vincent dot riviere at freesbee dot fr 2007-08-01 19:44 --- Great, it works ! Thank you, Alan. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4694 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching

[Bug binutils/4875] sha1.h:25:20: error: stdint.h: No such file or directory

2007-08-01 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-08-01 19:11 --- Subject: Re: New: sha1.h:25:20: error: stdint.h: No such file or directory Looks like this could be fixed by including "bfd_stdint.h" and adding an appropriate dependency to Makefile.am. Dave --

[Bug binutils/4875] New: sha1.h:25:20: error: stdint.h: No such file or directory

2007-08-01 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../src/ld -I. -D_GNU_SOURCE -I. -I../../src/ld -I.. /bfd -I../../src/ld/../bfd -I../../src/ld/../include -g -O2 -DLOCALEDIR="\"/opt /gnu64/share/locale\"" -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Werr or -g -O2 -c ../../src/ld/sha1.c In file included from .

[Bug binutils/4791] etc/standards.texi: @strong{Note...} produces a spurious cross-reference in Info

2007-08-01 Thread wilson at specifix dot com
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifix dot com 2007-08-01 17:57 --- Subject: Re: etc/standards.texi: @strong{Note...} produces a spurious cross-reference in Info On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 16:05 +, nightstrike at gmail dot com wrote: > Proposed patch to change two lines

Re: [Bug binutils/4791] etc/standards.texi: @strong{Note...} produces a spurious cross-reference in Info

2007-08-01 Thread Jim Wilson
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 16:05 +, nightstrike at gmail dot com wrote: > Proposed patch to change two lines in standards.texi standards.texi is not a binutils file, it is an FSF documentation file. It is wrong to change the wording of it without approval from the FSF. A better solution is to impor

Re: bug in ld

2007-08-01 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Martin, Here is a bug report with gnu tool suite for arm: arm-elf-as: 2.17 arm-elf-ld: 2.17 Have you tried using the latest sources from the mainline of the binutils CVS binutils repository ? If not then I would strongly urge you to do so. I suspect that this bug has already been fix

[Bug binutils/4791] etc/standards.texi: @strong{Note...} produces a spurious cross-reference in Info

2007-08-01 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-08-01 16:53 --- Hi, Your patch removes the emphasis which seems to be wrong. Why not just move the colon characters outside of the @strong{...} directives ? Cheers Nick -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

[Bug binutils/4791] etc/standards.texi: @strong{Note...} produces a spurious cross-reference in Info

2007-08-01 Thread nightstrike at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From nightstrike at gmail dot com 2007-08-01 16:05 --- Created an attachment (id=1939) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1939&action=view) Proposed patch to change two lines in standards.texi I supplied this patch in my first comment, and am

[Bug binutils/4791] etc/standards.texi: @strong{Note...} produces a spurious cross-reference in Info

2007-08-01 Thread nightstrike at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From nightstrike at gmail dot com 2007-08-01 16:03 --- Can someone look at this patch that I supplied? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4791 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watch

[Bug binutils/4030] objdump ignores .gnu_debuglink

2007-08-01 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-08-01 14:12 --- Does this patch http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2007-06/msg00080.html fix this problem? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4030 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are o

[Bug libc/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice

2007-08-01 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
-- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-08-01 11:24:00 date|

[Bug libc/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice

2007-08-01 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
-- What|Removed |Added Component|binutils|libc Product|binutils|glibc Version|2.18 (HEAD) |2.4

[Bug ld/4694] ld corrupts a.out text sections

2007-08-01 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-08-01 11:09 --- http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2007-08/msg2.html -- What|Removed |Added