--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-12 21:33 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> both failed here: replacing libc.so.6 breaks the system completly. no command
> will work anymore.
Were 2 libc.so.6 built from the identical source? Is the ONLY difference
binutils 2.17.50.
--- Additional Comments From andyradke at web dot de 2007-07-12 21:20
---
both failed here: replacing libc.so.6 breaks the system completly. no command
will work anymore.
i could revert the patch cleaning out some parts. but now binutils won't build
anymore claiming problems with struct
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-12 16:00 ---
It is just a guess. It may be related to
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-11/msg00178.html
Can you back it out from 2.17.50.0.7 and give it a try?
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781
---
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-12 15:45 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> with last working version .06: http://pastebin.archlinux.org/9374
>
> broken recent .17: http://pastebin.archlinux.org/9375
When you copy /lib64/libc.so.6 from the good machine to the bad m
--- Additional Comments From andyradke at web dot de 2007-07-12 07:33
---
with last working version .06: http://pastebin.archlinux.org/9374
broken recent .17: http://pastebin.archlinux.org/9375
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781
--- You are receiving this ma
