[Bug binutils/4712] BFD: section .data1/.bss can't be allocated in segment 0

2007-06-30 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-07-01 05:37 --- I think http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-12/msg00165.html should also be adjusting lma. Index: bfd/elf.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bf

[Bug binutils/4716] --strip-unneeded strips too much with relocatable ELF objects from fpc/nasm

2007-06-30 Thread vapier at gentoo dot org
--- Additional Comments From vapier at gentoo dot org 2007-06-30 14:33 --- binutils 2.16.1, 2.17, 2.17.50.0.17, and current CVS HEAD all exhibit the same behavior for me -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4716 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You a

[Bug binutils/4716] --strip-unneeded strips too much with relocatable ELF objects from fpc/nasm

2007-06-30 Thread vapier at gentoo dot org
--- Additional Comments From vapier at gentoo dot org 2007-06-30 14:25 --- Created an attachment (id=1906) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1906&action=view) syscall.o object from fpc -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4716 --- You are recei

[Bug binutils/4716] New: --strip-unneeded strips too much with relocatable ELF objects from fpc/nasm

2007-06-30 Thread vapier at gentoo dot org
relocatable ELF objects generated by fpc (the free pascal compiler) dont seem to play well with `strip --strip-unneeded` ... i'm wondering if this is a bug in strip or in fpc (it not generating enough ELF information), but i think it's a bug in strip ;) for example, in the attached object produced