[Bug gas/4414] unrecognized option `-mc68020'

2007-04-23 Thread schwab at suse dot de
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2007-04-23 23:36 --- The assembler can only be configured for a single target cpu (which defaults to host if not given). You need to configure binutils for the same primary target as the compiler. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/

[Bug gas/4414] New: unrecognized option `-mc68020'

2007-04-23 Thread ivbx at mail dot ru
Ñonfigure binutils with option --enable-targets=all --enable-shared --program- prefix=all-target- --prefix=/usr/local/binutils During compilation "gcc" with options --enable-shared \ --enable-languages=c \ --verbose \ --program-prefix=m68k-coff- \ --with-as=/usr/local/binutils/bin/all-target-as --

Re: Error: can't resolve `.hcu.uncommon_code' {.hcu.uncommon_code section} - `.LFB17' {.text section}

2007-04-23 Thread Jim Wilson
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 09:34 -0700, Kristis Makris wrote: > It seems that gcc does not even produce the inline assembly after the > last goto, perhaps because it is deemed that it's dead code. Seems right. > However, I > need this assembly produced to emit the section change to ".text". Is > ther

Re: Error: can't resolve `.hcu.uncommon_code' {.hcu.uncommon_code section} - `.LFB17' {.text section}

2007-04-23 Thread Andreas Schwab
Kristis Makris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Labels as values are not ISO C. Neither are asm statements. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 82

Re: Error: can't resolve `.hcu.uncommon_code' {.hcu.uncommon_code section} - `.LFB17' {.text section}

2007-04-23 Thread Kristis Makris
Hi Jim, Thanks for the response. Indeed, there's no section change that would position label LFE17 in the .text section, where main is. On Sat, 2007-04-21 at 10:35 -0700, Jim Wilson wrote: > It looks like you are trying to do some complicated (and probably > fragile) section switching stuff in a

[Bug binutils/4412] windres is not 64bit are

2007-04-23 Thread sherpya at netfarm dot it
-- What|Removed |Added CC||sherpya at netfarm dot it http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4412 --- You are receiving this

[Bug binutils/4412] windres is not 64bit are

2007-04-23 Thread sherpya at netfarm dot it
--- Additional Comments From sherpya at netfarm dot it 2007-04-23 14:59 --- Created an attachment (id=1733) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1733&action=view) Fixes the problem above -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4412 --- You are receiv

[Bug binutils/4412] New: windres is not 64bit are

2007-04-23 Thread sherpya at netfarm dot it
Windres doesn't work if cross compiled on a 64bit system, I've made a patch that may have a also uneeded changes, but at least it works. It needs stdint.h I hope all the changes are enough -- Summary: windres is not 64bit are Product: binutils Version: 2.17

[Bug ld/4409] New: --unresolved-symbols=ignore-all issues on ia64

2007-04-23 Thread jakub at redhat dot com
cat > a.c