--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-03-29
03:40 ---
Powerpc bug fixed by
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2007-03/msg00177.html.
I am not able to fully test the sparc64 problem because the testcase lacks libm
and libc, however I did find a segfault i
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-03-29
01:40 ---
Looks like a linker bug in elf32-ppc.c:allocate_dynrelocs. Testing a fix.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4267
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the C
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-03-29 01:31:23
date|
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |amodra at bigpond dot net
|redhat dot com |dot au
http://sourceware.org/bugzil
--- Additional Comments From doko at debian dot org 2007-03-28 19:20
---
Not sure, if it's only a ld bug; the gcc powerpc build was configured with
-enable-secureplt. Omitting this option results in a sucessful gcc bootstrap.
related to http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31364
Hi Vijaya,
I am facing a particular issue in GNU ld version 2.15 on Solaris(SPARC). I
would like to know if it is already resolved.
I am trying to create a 64bit app using gnu ld.
The gnu ld fails to produce the 64bit executable if any of the objects
contain 32 bit data relocations. (R_SPARC_32)
Hi Daniel,
strata:/home/dr2867/c/modules 1026 $$$ ->as --version
GNU assembler 2.15 [FreeBSD] 2004-05-23
This is an old version of the assembler.
strata:/home/dr2867/c/modules 1028 $$$ ->ld --version
GNU ld version 2.15 [FreeBSD] 2004-05-23
And an old version of the linker. We are at rele
