--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-03-17 06:26
---
Hi Sami,
Patch version 3 has now been uploaded :-) Please give it a whirl.
Cheers
Nick
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4110
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You a
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-03-17 06:25
---
Created an attachment (id=1623)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1623&action=view)
Add more tests for broken object files
--
What|Removed |Added
-
When building a Linux MIPS kernel, a link failure occured while building one of
the driver subsystems in a Linux 2.6.12 tree. The versions of the tools to
create the cross compiler were:
binutils-2.17.50.0.12
gcc-4.2-20070131
linux-headers-2.6.12
A snippet of the output is below:
L
--- Additional Comments From sliedes at cc dot hut dot fi 2007-03-16 21:00
---
Created an attachment (id=1622)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1622&action=view)
Still one more file that crashes nm
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4110
---
--- Additional Comments From sliedes at cc dot hut dot fi 2007-03-16 20:59
---
HEAD + 4110.elf.c.patch.2 does not crash with either the test case in this bug
or the one I mistakenly attached to #4109. However I still could generate one
broken enough that crashes nm. I'll attach that on
--- Additional Comments From psfales at alcatel-lucent dot com 2007-03-16
19:20 ---
The elf.c.patch2 file looks good from what I can see. (It didn't apply cleanly
on top of elf.c.patch, but it wasn't too hard to apply manually)
After making that change I retested all the known problems
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-03-16 15:36
---
Hi Sami,
Please could you try the newly upload revised patch. If you have the old
patch applied to your sources, please remove that one first. (I think that my
first version was a little bit over enthusiastic.
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-03-16 15:34
---
Created an attachment (id=1621)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1621&action=view)
Revised form of previous patch without the loop rewriting.
--
What|Removed
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:09:39AM -0400, Paul Koning wrote:
> > "Steven" == Steven J Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Steven> Greetings. I have been chasing down a binutils regression
> Steven> that is preventing me from building a Linux/MIPS kernel using
> Steven> a gcc-4.2 based too
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-03-16 14:09
---
Hi Peter,
Please could you try out the new patch I have uploaded (elf.c.patch.2). This
patch should be applied after the first elf.c.patch. I think that it will fix
the problem, but I cannot be certain. (It m
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-03-16 14:07
---
Created an attachment (id=1620)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1620&action=view)
Widen scope of test for segments that need rewriting
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3
> "Steven" == Steven J Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steven> Greetings. I have been chasing down a binutils regression
Steven> that is preventing me from building a Linux/MIPS kernel using
Steven> a gcc-4.2 based toolchain. Here is the snippet of output when
Steven> building a 2.6.12 k
12 matches
Mail list logo
