[Bug gas/3797] gas failures for d10v-elf on HEAD

2007-02-28 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-02-28 18:38 --- Hi Hans-Peter, The d10v port should now have no GAS testsuite failures. There were two problems. The first is that the d10v port does not produce dwarf2 line number information. This is because the port w

[Bug ld/3796] ld failures for arm-elf on HEAD

2007-02-28 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-02-28 17:14 --- Hi Hans-Peter, OK, the linker testsuite now has 0 unexpected failures for the following ARM targets: arm-eabi arm-elf arm-epoc-pe arm-linux arm-netbsdelf arm-nto arm-symbianelf arm-wince-pe The

[Bug gas/3795] gas failures for arm-elf on HEAD

2007-02-28 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-02-28 14:39 --- Hi Hans-Peter, I have checked in a patch to tweak the expected results for the ARM tests. The GAS testsuite now has 0 failures for almost all ARM targets. The tested targets that have no failures are: arm-e

[Bug gas/2623] No line separator character is defined for msp430-gas

2007-02-28 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-02-28 10:02 --- Hi Robert, Excellent. I have applied the uploaded patch along with this ChangeLog entry. Cheers Nick gas/ChangeLog PR gas/2623 * config/tc-msp430.c (line_separator_char): Change to '{'. --

[Bug gas/2623] No line separator character is defined for msp430-gas

2007-02-28 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-02-28 10:01 --- Created an attachment (id=1588) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1588&action=view) Change line command character to '{' -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2623 --- You

[Bug gas/4089] GAS allows using 64-bit regs in 32-bit mode (Intel syntax)

2007-02-28 Thread artyom dot yakimov at intel dot com
--- Additional Comments From artyom dot yakimov at intel dot com 2007-02-28 08:29 --- Is that allowed to use %, $ whatever with intel_syntax noprefix? What does 'noprefix' mean in this case? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4089 --- You are receiving this mail

[Bug gas/4089] GAS allows using 64-bit regs in 32-bit mode (Intel syntax)

2007-02-28 Thread jbeulich at novell dot com
--- Additional Comments From jbeulich at novell dot com 2007-02-28 08:25 --- As can be seen from the generated opcode, 'rax' is taken as a symbol name rather than a register here. This is the expected behavior when not using % prefixes for register names. -- What|Removed