[Bug ld/3169] elfxx-ia64.c doesn't support @ltoff(@fptr(_DYNAMIC#))

2006-09-11 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-09-11 22:17 --- I used --- elf64-ia64.c2006-09-11 15:13:43.0 -0700 +++ elf64-ia64.c.new2006-09-07 16:12:39.0 -0700 @@ -3275,7 +3275,14 @@ allocate_fptr (dyn_i, data) if (!bfd_elf_link_record_

[Bug ld/3191] segmentation fault in read_unsigned_leb128()

2006-09-11 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-09-11 22:08 --- If you can provide a testcase, I will look into it. -- What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug ld/3169] elfxx-ia64.c doesn't support @ltoff(@fptr(_DYNAMIC#))

2006-09-11 Thread wilson at specifix dot com
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifix dot com 2006-09-11 20:26 --- Subject: Re: New: ld elf64-ia64.c segfault in set_fptr_entry On Sun, 2006-09-03 at 10:36 +, tbm at cyrius dot com wrote: > It fails both with Debian binutils 2.17 and current CVS HEAD. > /gcc-lib/ia64-linu

RE: Multiple setting of a symbol

2006-09-11 Thread Schwarz, Konrad
> From: Nick Clifton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Specifically, given the code > > > > my_variable: > > .long X > > X = 1 > > X = 2 > > > > the new version assembles the value 1 into my_variable, > while the old > > version assembles the value 2. > > The problem with this is wha

[Bug binutils/3110] unsupported relocation type {R_SPARC_H44, R_SPARC_WDISP30, R_SPARC_64}

2006-09-11 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2006-09-11 15:02 --- simple testcase: $ sparc64-sun-solaris2.9-g++ -o /dev/null -Wl,--whole-archive libboost_filesystem.a /local/devel/toolchain41/sparc64-sun-solaris2.9/lib/gcc/sparc64-sun-solaris2.9/4.1.2/../../../../sparc64-sun-solar

[Bug binutils/3110] unsupported relocation type {R_SPARC_H44, R_SPARC_WDISP30, R_SPARC_64}

2006-09-11 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2006-09-11 14:56 --- (In reply to comment #8) > Patch checked in.z thanks. i have one more sparc64 issue. the sparc64-sun-solaris2.9-ld rejects boost's static libraries with 'skipping incompatible...'. as far i can see, the `nomachine`

[Bug binutils/3110] unsupported relocation type {R_SPARC_H44, R_SPARC_WDISP30, R_SPARC_64}

2006-09-11 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-09-11 14:41 --- Patch checked in.z -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug binutils/3107] ld internal error ldlang.c 4272

2006-09-11 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-09-11 14:31 --- Hi Rus, The patch should apply to the current sources in the mainline of the CVS repository. Cheers Nick -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3107 --- You are receiving this mail becau

[Bug gas/3172] iwmmxt control registers not hanlded correctly

2006-09-11 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-09-11 14:28 --- Hi Tomas, My apologese for the delay in looking at this bug. Your patch is fine, so I have checked in in along with this ChangeLog entry. Cheers Nick gas/ChangeLog 2006-09-11 Tomas Frydrych <[EMAIL PROTE

[Bug ld/3191] New: segmentation fault in read_unsigned_leb128()

2006-09-11 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
after fixing PR3186 i get another error during linkinig a large shared c++ library (c.a. 48MB of object files). ld: Dwarf Error: Could not find abbrev number 9690. ld: Dwarf Error: DW_FORM_strp offset (30408704) greater than or equal to .debug_str size (211156). ld: Dwarf Error: DW_FORM_strp offs

[Bug binutils/3110] unsupported relocation type {R_SPARC_H44, R_SPARC_WDISP30, R_SPARC_64}

2006-09-11 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2006-09-11 08:13 --- works fine :) -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3110 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___

[Bug gas/3172] iwmmxt control registers not hanlded correctly

2006-09-11 Thread dr dot tomas at yahoo dot co dot uk
--- Additional Comments From dr dot tomas at yahoo dot co dot uk 2006-09-11 07:58 --- Sorry, but I have no desire to signup to yet another list just to post a patch. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3172 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are o