--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-08-23 17:15
---
Already fixed in mainline
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RE
Hi Freddy,
I was trying to build a cross toolchains and ar
(hppa64-hp-hpux11.00-ar) crashed compiling. I have a big uid and I
discover that this cause a core in bfd/archive.c. I think the following
fix is clear enough.
It is. Thanks for catching this. I have checked your patch in along
wi
--- Additional Comments From doreille at smr dot ch 2006-08-23 15:35
---
Created an attachment (id=1243)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1243&action=view)
gprof execution profile of ld
This is the gprof call graph profile data of ld (binutils-060823 ) linking
th
This bug occurs with the binutils-060823 snapshot and binutils-2.16.91.0.6-5
(fedora-5) on both x86-64 and i386 architectures. It do not occur with
binutils-2.15.94 (fedora-4).
When linking C++ files compiled by GCC 4.1.1 with the -g option ld take 3
minutes to link . Without the -g option the l
--- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2006-08-23 11:48 ---
Created an attachment (id=1242)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1242&action=view)
reduced lib.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3110
--- You are receiving this mail be
--- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2006-08-23 11:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=1241)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1241&action=view)
reduced lib.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3110
--- You are receiving this mail be
--- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2006-08-23 11:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=1240)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1240&action=view)
reduced lib.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3110
--- You are receiving this mail be
--- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2006-08-23 11:26 ---
the main trick here is that boost archives were built with
"true" option. it means they can be used
as statically linked parts of shared objects.
strip works perfect with these *.o files extracted from *.a
so i think
$ sparc64-sun-solaris2.9-strip --strip-debug *.a
BFD: st3IYdGV/greg_weekday.o: unsupported relocation type R_SPARC_H44
sparc64-sun-solaris2.9-strip: st3IYdGV/greg_weekday.o: Bad value
BFD: stbZAhUO/operations_posix_windows.o: unsupported relocation type
R_SPARC_WDISP30
sparc64-sun-solaris2.9-stri
--- Additional Comments From boris dot leidner at formenos dot de
2006-08-23 11:05 ---
Hi Nick,
you're right. The problem was not shown in my example. The relocations are
correct:
$ arm-wince-pe-objdump -d armtest.o -r
armtest.o: file format pe-arm-little
Disassembly of section .
Well,
I was trying to build a cross toolchains and ar
(hppa64-hp-hpux11.00-ar) crashed compiling. I have a big uid and I
discover that this cause a core in bfd/archive.c. I think the following
fix is clear enough.
diff -r -U10 binutils-2.17/bfd/archive.c binutils-2.17.my/bfd/archive.c
--- binut
--- Additional Comments From rus at kt dot od dot ua 2006-08-23 10:44
---
Created an attachment (id=1239)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1239&action=view)
Smallest [ meaningless from programming point of view ] test case
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3107
--- You are receiving this mail because:
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-08-23 10:13
---
Subject: Re: New: ld internal error ldlang.c 4272
Hi,
> This is standart GNU cross tool for arm-elf (gcc-4.1.1 & binutils 2.17.50.0.3
> 20060715). After adding ld option "--gc-sections" got this error:
>
> ...
Hi,
This is standart GNU cross tool for arm-elf (gcc-4.1.1 & binutils 2.17.50.0.3
20060715). After adding ld option "--gc-sections" got this error:
...
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-elf/4.1.1/../../../../arm-elf/bin/ld: internal error ldlang.c
4272
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
...
Can supply any a
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3109
--- You are receiving this mail because:
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-08-23 10:11
---
Subject: Re: New: GAS assembles incorrect branches using target
arm-wince-pe
Hi Boris,
> $ arm-wince-pe-objdump -d armtest.o
This is insufficient. Please add the "-r" switch to the objdump command
line.
> 0
Hi Boris,
$ arm-wince-pe-objdump -d armtest.o
This is insufficient. Please add the "-r" switch to the objdump command
line.
<_start>:
0: e1a01001mov r1, r1
4: ea00b 8 <_start+0x8>
The -r switch should show you that there is a relocation f
--- Additional Comments From boris dot leidner at formenos dot de
2006-08-23 09:58 ---
I do not know why objdump (not GAS) and GDB disassemble code differently
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3109
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on
I assembled the following code:
.text
.global _start
_start:
mov r1, r1
b _start
.end
$ arm-wince-pe-as armtest.s -o armtest.o
$ arm-wince-pe-objdump -d armtest.o
armtest.o: file format pe-arm-little
Disassembly of section .text:
<_start>:
0: e1a01001
20 matches
Mail list logo