--- Additional Comments From hochstein at algo dot informatik dot
tu-darmstadt dot de 2006-04-04 06:53 ---
Why not strive for it if it can be done easily?
I use avrora (http://compilers.cs.ucla.edu/avrora/) to simulate the AVR program
before writing it onto the real device. This simulat
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-04-04
06:02 ---
Can you attach some example binaries, please? It does not make sense that
x86-64 binaries produced by a modern version of GCC would produce stabs
debugging info. I suspect your debugging session has giv
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-04-04
01:57 ---
Updating priority.
--
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |amodra at bigpond dot net
|redhat dot com |dot au
http://sourceware.org/bugzil
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |amodra at bigpond dot net
|redhat dot com |dot au
http://sourceware.org/bugzil
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-04-04
01:54 ---
This patch suggests that you are trying to make the disassembler's output
suitable for input back into the assembler, correct? This is not normally
something that the disassembler strives for.
What are
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
Priority|P1 |P2
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2503
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |bje at sources dot redhat
|redhat dot com |dot com
Status|NEW
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2112
--- You are receiving this mail because:
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2006-04-04
01:28 ---
ar is not just for use with object files. For instance, debian uses archives
for their package format. Making ar "clever" like this would require that you
inspect all archive contents recursively, to ens
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |bje at sources dot redhat
|redhat dot com |dot com
Status|NEW
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |bje at sources dot redhat
|redhat dot com |dot com
Status|NEW
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |amodra at bigpond dot net
|redhat dot com |dot au
http://sourceware.org/bugzil
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2006-04-04
01:20 ---
I'm fairly certain this bug has been fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |amodra at bigpond dot net
|redhat dot com |dot au
http://sourceware.org/bugzil
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |amodra at bigpond dot net
|redhat dot com |dot au
Status|WAITING
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |amodra at bigpond dot net
|redhat dot com |dot au
http://sourceware.org/bugzil
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |echristo at apple dot com
|redhat dot com |
Status|NEW
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |echristo at apple dot com
|redhat dot com |
Status|WAITING
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |echristo at apple dot com
|redhat dot com |
Status|NEW
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |echristo at apple dot com
|redhat dot com |
Status|NEW
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |echristo at apple dot com
|redhat dot com |
Status|NEW
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |echristo at apple dot com
|redhat dot com |
Status|NEW
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |echristo at apple dot com
|redhat dot com |
Status|NEW
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |echristo at apple dot com
|redhat dot com |
Status|NEW
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |echristo at apple dot com
|redhat dot com |
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-04-03
23:56 ---
Thanks for the excellent analysis, Jim. I think I will just rework the code to
avoid this warning.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1298
--- You are receiving this mail because
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifix dot com 2006-04-03 22:20
---
This is due to a gcc bug. Unfortunately, this bug may be hard to fix.
Meanwhile, binutils will fail to compile if affected files are compiled with
-Werror. Short term workarounds might be to rearrange the cod
28 matches
Mail list logo
