Is this problem already fixed ?
My blog: http://verypondycherry.blogspot.com
On 3/24/06, Piyush Garyali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> bug in ld.so. reporting
>
> BUG IN DYNAMIC LINKER ld.so: ../sysdeps/i386/dl-machine.h: 391:
> elf_machine_lazy
> _rel: Assertion `((reloc->r_info) & 0xff) ==
bug in ld.so. reporting
BUG IN DYNAMIC LINKER ld.so: ../sysdeps/i386/dl-machine.h: 391: elf_machine_lazy
_rel: Assertion `((reloc->r_info) & 0xff) == 7' failed!
regards
Piyush
--
My blog: http://verypondycherry.blogspot.com
___
bug-binutils mail
I would like to use gprof on CentOS 4.3 and tested gprof for a
program.
$ gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/3.4.5/specs
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man
--infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix
--disable-checking --w
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2006-03-24
13:26 ---
It doesn't make any difference whether an archive is specified as -lfoo or
libfoo.a on the command line. You can force inclusion of the archive using
--whole-archive.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla
--- Additional Comments From binutils dot scyt at spamgourmet dot com
2006-03-24 09:25 ---
You are aware of the fact that I didn't use the -l option? From the
documentation you pointed to I would expect that archives specified as input
files without -l are either handled like objects or
