--- Additional Comments From others1 at pervalidus dot net 2006-03-17
23:30 ---
Thanks, I just tested it.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2462
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-17 21:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=929)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=929&action=view)
An updated patch for gnu-efi 3.0b
This new patch should work for gcc 4.0.3.
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-17 21:00 ---
Which gcc are you using? -march=i386 shouldn't be needed.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2464
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watc
--- Additional Comments From mjg59 at srcf dot ucam dot org 2006-03-17
20:46 ---
Hmm. I still appear to need -march=i386, but other than that can build
successfully. Thanks!
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2464
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
Y
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-17 20:13 ---
The problem is in gnu-efi 3.0b, not binutils.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-17 20:13 ---
Created an attachment (id=928)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=928&action=view)
A patch for elilo 3.6
The comments in elilo 3.6 about gcc versions for ia32 are misleading. This
patch removes the
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-17 20:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=927)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=927&action=view)
A patch for gnu-efi 3.0b
The bug is in the linker scripts in gnu-efi 3.0b. With this patch, there is
no need to us
--- Additional Comments From dcoutts at gentoo dot org 2006-03-17 18:41
---
Created an attachment (id=926)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=926&action=view)
Possible patch to make _bfd_generic_bfd_free_cached_info effective
Just to be concrete, here's a patch that
--- Additional Comments From mjg59 at srcf dot ucam dot org 2006-03-17
17:17 ---
Sorry, I'm not entirely clear on that - you're using gnu-efi 3.0b? I had to
build that with -march=i386 as well, but once I had done had no problem in
building elilo with older binutils (regardless of gcc ve
--- Additional Comments From dcoutts at gentoo dot org 2006-03-17 17:15
---
To try and make this patch less of a hack I tried this:
add a new _bfd_generic_bfd_free_cached_info and in libbfd.h change the
#define _bfd_generic_bfd_free_cached_info bfd_true
to a proper prototype:
bfd_boolea
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-17 17:13 ---
gnu-efi 3.0b works with gcc 3.4, 4.0 and 4.1.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
--- Additional Comments From mjg59 at srcf dot ucam dot org 2006-03-17
17:09 ---
Which version of gnu-efi are you using?
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2464
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching so
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-17 16:59 ---
I tried -march=i386 with gcc version 4.0.3 20060213 and gcc version 3.4.6
20060301
using binutils 2.16.91 20051023. I couldn't get a working EFI application.
--
What|Removed |Adde
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 02:36:59AM -0800, Ho Van Huong wrote:
> /bin/sh ./../ylwrap "" deffilep.y y.tab.c deffilep.c
> y.tab.h deffilep.h -- -d
> -d: not found
You might be missing `flex', http://www.gnu.org/software/flex/>.
Regards,
Thomas
___
bug
--- Additional Comments From dcoutts at gentoo dot org 2006-03-17 15:18
---
After looking at the code a bit more I have these observations:
as we map over each element in the archive, it is the call to:
bfd_check_format (current, bfd_object);
that makes the current bfd swell in memory u
--- Additional Comments From mjg59 at srcf dot ucam dot org 2006-03-17
13:53 ---
Every gcc version I've tested works, providing I use -march=i386.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2464
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for t
--- Additional Comments From dcoutts at gentoo dot org 2006-03-17 12:33
---
Changing summary to be more accurate. The quadratic thing is a misleading since
we only get that behaviour with xargs (where we're basically running ranlib a
linear number of times on an archive that is growing l
--- Additional Comments From jbeulich at novell dot com 2006-03-17 08:26
---
This should be resolved with a checkin from 2005-10-27.
--
What|Removed |Added
Statu
18 matches
Mail list logo
