--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-17 06:44 ---
I also saw this on Linux/x86-64.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2462
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
__
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-17 06:33 ---
Paul, it looks like your patch:
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-05/msg00170.html
puts a some random bytes at the end of output. Can you look into it? Thanks.
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-17 05:31 ---
Do you have a list of known working/non-working gcc versions?
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2464
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-17 03:52 ---
What was the date of last working binutils, which I can use to check out
from binutils CVS mainline with
# cvs co -D "x"
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2464
--- You are receiving this m
--- Additional Comments From mjg59 at srcf dot ucam dot org 2006-03-17
03:59 ---
2005-10-24 is broken, but narrowing it down further (based on the times) the
patch you committed for that (dated the 23rd, but appeared on the 24th judging
by CVS timstamps) is the turning point - before tha
--- Additional Comments From mjg59 at srcf dot ucam dot org 2006-03-17
03:43 ---
gcc-4.0.3 appears to work with gnu-efi 3.0b. I'm using the tarball and diff from
http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/gnu-efi/ .
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2464
--- You
--- Additional Comments From drow at false dot org 2006-03-17 03:18 ---
Subject: Re: "ar q" gives quadratic memory use
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 12:46:53AM -, dcoutts at gentoo dot org wrote:
> This problem with ranlib/ar memory consumption is made worse by the fact that
> we
> have
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-17 03:16 ---
I don't need elilo.so since I can generate working EFI applications. We have 2
problems here, gcc and binutils. Which gcc can be used for gnu-efi? I know gcc
2.96 works and gcc 3.2 doesn't work. How about gcc 3.4 and g
--- Additional Comments From dcoutts at gentoo dot org 2006-03-17 03:08
---
Interestingly, this bit has no noticable effect on memory use.
/* Now ask the BFD to free up any cached information, so we
don't fill all of memory with symbol tables. */
if (!
--- Additional Comments From dcoutts at gentoo dot org 2006-03-17 02:57
---
Adding some instrumantation shows that the spike in memory use occurs within the
function _bfd_compute_and_write_armap() in bfd's archive.c module.
It maps over each object file in the archive and allocates symb
--- Additional Comments From mjg59 at srcf dot ucam dot org 2006-03-17
02:49 ---
gnu-efi 3.0a is incompatible with gcc 4, to the best of my knowledge. Using
gcc-4.0 with -march=i386 and binutils before 2005-10-23 I can build working
elilo binaries. After that date (to be precise, the pat
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-17 02:36 ---
I can use gcc 2.96 from RH 7.3 and the Linux binutils 2.13.90.0.4 to
generate working EFI applications.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2464
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
Y
--
What|Removed |Added
GCC host triplet|*-*-* |
GCC target triplet|*-*-* |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1387
--
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-17
02:34 ---
HJ's patch (http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-02/msg00146.html) was
committed:
2006-02-16 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR ld/2322
* elf.c (get_segment_type): New function.
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-17
02:29 ---
These aren't pseudo-ops as such. These are part of the assembly language syntax
which is not normally documented in the GAS manual for each target. This
documentation can be obtained elsewhere. However
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-17
01:50 ---
Changing to an enhancement request.
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal
--- Additional Comments From dcoutts at gentoo dot org 2006-03-17 00:46
---
I tried using the 'S' modifier which did make adding archive members faster (by
not building the symbol index). However it also missed members out for some
reason which I have not figured out yet.
Further tests
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |wilson at sources dot redhat
|redhat dot com |dot com
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-16 23:16 ---
Please provide a simple source code with instructions to reproduce the problem
you have described.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2462
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You ar
--
What|Removed |Added
GCC host triplet|opteron linux x86_64|x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2335
--- You are receiving this m
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-16 19:43 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolut
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-16 19:42 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolut
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-17
01:11 ---
There is nothing here to suggest a problem with binutils, but more likely, a
non-functional build system for the package that the user is trying to build.
No further feedback for almost 9 months.
--
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=800
--- You are receiving this mail because: -
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |bje at sources dot redhat
|redhat dot com |dot com
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-17
01:02 ---
Reproduced using CVS HEAD.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1008
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |wilson at sources dot redhat
|redhat dot com |dot com
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-17
00:45 ---
Fixed with this patch:
Checking in doc/as.texinfo;
/cvs/src/src/gas/doc/as.texinfo,v <-- as.texinfo
new revision: 1.141; previous revision: 1.140
done
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-17
00:39 ---
Hi Nick
I cannot reproduce this bug either. It's almost been a year since you responded
to the submitter and they have not responded. I propose that we close this bug
report.
Cheers, Ben
--
--
What|Removed |Added
GCC host triplet|Freebsd i386|i386-pc-freebsd
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=998
--- You are receiving this mail becaus
--
What|Removed |Added
GCC host triplet|Freebsd i386|i386-pc-freebsd
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=997
--- You are receiving this mail becaus
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |bje at sources dot redhat
|redhat dot com |dot com
Status|NEW
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |bje at sources dot redhat
|redhat dot com |dot com
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-16
23:59 ---
Patch posted:
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-03/msg00226.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |bje at sources dot redhat
|redhat dot com |dot com
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From others1 at pervalidus dot net 2006-03-16
23:43 ---
I can reproduce it with anything, even a single
#include
void main(void) {
printf("Hello world \n");
}
New binutils:
$ gcc -o foo -Wl,-s foo.c
foo.c: In function `main':
foo.c:2: warning: return type of '
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-16 23:22 ---
I couldn't even get simple EFI applications in gnu-efi 3.0a to work on
IA32 with various versions of gcc and binutils.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2464
--- You are receiving this mail bec
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-16 23:09 ---
Please also tell me which version of binutils works.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2464
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching
--- Additional Comments From others1 at pervalidus dot net 2006-03-16
23:08 ---
As I wrote, I'm very clueless about it, so I don't know how to write a
testcase.
Would that help if I upload my binutils somewhere ? I could also give ssh access
to whoever wants to take a look.
--
htt
--
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||2464
nThis||
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1487
--
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||1487
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2464
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-16 22:08 ---
Please provide a working elilo.so.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2464
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl at lucon dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2442
--- You are receiving this mail
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl at lucon dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2462
--- You are receiving this mail
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-16 19:51 ---
We need a testcase to look into it. An executable doesn't help here.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-16 19:48 ---
I need a testcase to look into it. You can contact me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] if
it helps.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2442
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC
When building an arhive with lots of .o files (eg over 10,000) GNU ar takes a
very long time and lots of memory.
One might hope that the 'q' "quick append" option might operate in linear time
and constant memory (since all it needs to do is to append to the archive
without looking at the existing
47 matches
Mail list logo
