On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 04:30 +, hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-07 04:30
> ---
> The difference is I don't think this alone will cause kernel boot problem.
So there is no actual bug here apparently. You just noticed the debug
in
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifix dot com 2005-10-07 06:53
---
Subject: Re: IA64 assembler generates bad 2.6.9 Linux kernel.
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 04:32 +, hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-07 04:32
> ---
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 04:32 +, hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-07 04:32
> ---
> Will this kernel change fix the kernel? Will this kernel change work with
> the old assembler?
The patch will work regardless of what slot the assem
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-07 04:32 ---
Will this kernel change fix the kernel? Will this kernel change work with
the old assembler?
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1433
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on t
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-07 04:30 ---
The difference is I don't think this alone will cause kernel boot problem.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1434
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the
--- Additional Comments From rth at redhat dot com 2005-10-07 01:52 ---
Subject: Re: IA64 assembler generates bad 2.6.9 Linux kernel.
> 2) Why does the kernel care whether we use slot 1 or slot 2 here?
It's got some runtime code patching code that assumes it.
> Maybe the kernel can be
--- Additional Comments From rth at redhat dot com 2005-10-07 01:37 ---
Subject: Re: IA64 assembler generates bad 2.6.9 Linux kernel.
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 01:18:37AM -, wilson at specifix dot com wrote:
> 1) Why did Richard move the code? Did he run into some problem with the
>
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifix dot com 2005-10-07 01:19
---
Subject: Re: IA64 assembler generates different debug info
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 17:33, hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
> -5e01 00020027 R_IA64_DIR64LSB .text + 12
> +5e01
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 17:33, hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
> -5e01 00020027 R_IA64_DIR64LSB .text + 12
> +5e01 00020027 R_IA64_DIR64LSB .text + 11
Isn't this exactly the same problem as gas/1433? Interpretation of tags
in the presence
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifix dot com 2005-10-07 01:18
---
Subject: Re: IA64 assembler generates bad 2.6.9 Linux kernel.
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 16:24, hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
> - 0001004d R_IA64_PCREL32LSB .text + 2
> +
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 16:24, hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
> - 0001004d R_IA64_PCREL32LSB .text + 2
> + 0001004d R_IA64_PCREL32LSB .text + 1
This seems to be an old debate reborn. When we have relocs, tags, debug
info, whatever tha
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-07 00:33 ---
Created an attachment (id=688)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=688&action=view)
A testcase
"new-as" is the bad as and "old-as" is the good one without the patch. I got
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dwarf2
This patch
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-09/msg00234.html
causes ia64 assembler to generate different debug info.
--
Summary: IA64 assembler generates different debug info
Product: binutils
Version: 2.17 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-06 23:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=687)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=687&action=view)
A simpler testcase
The problem is in tag handling:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dwarf2-2]$ make
./new-as -x -mconstant-gp -o
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-06 23:20 ---
It seems that the new assembler doesn't handle tag correctly.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1433
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-06 23:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=686)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=686&action=view)
A testcase
"new-as" is the bad as and "old-as" is the good one without the patch. I got
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dwarf2-
--- Additional Comments From pfl at iis dot fhg dot de 2005-10-06 22:43
---
I built gcc-4.0.1 with binutils-2.16.1 as/ld on mips-sgi-irix6.5 and
tried to link Qt-4.0.0. The result was this error:
/usr/lib32/libpthread.so: undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init'
$ nm /usr/lib32/libpth
This patch
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-09/msg00234.html
causes the RHEL 4 U2 kernel, 2.6.9-22.EL, failed to boot.
--
Summary: IA64 assembler generates bad 2.6.9 Linux kernel.
Product: binutils
Version: 2.17 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Sev
18 matches
Mail list logo
