Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 11:27:38AM -0500, Jay Monkman wrote:
>
>>I'm using a cross assembler for ARM, running on x86, and seeing something
>>weird.
>>
>>Here's the test program:
>>
>>foo:
>> mov r0, #675
>>
...
>
> You should take another look at the ARM inst
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-02 15:57 ---
An updated patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-10/msg6.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1396
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-02 14:23 ---
A patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-10/msg5.html
--
What|Removed |Added
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 11:27:38AM -0500, Jay Monkman wrote:
> I'm using a cross assembler for ARM, running on x86, and seeing something
> weird.
>
> Here's the test program:
>
> foo:
> mov r0, #675
>
> Assemble with this:
> arm-linux-as -o foo.o foo.S
>
> Here's what happens:
>
Hi Folks,
tonite I tried to compile the new version of binutils (2.16.1)
on various SUN-Workstations without success.
(1) First of all, there saemas to be a bug, if you use
"./configure --prefix /usr/gnu"
I got errors when typeing "make" in the sub directories
"bfd" and "libiber
