[Bug ld/1031] linker errors on solaris10 (symbol versioning?)

2005-07-01 Thread funtoos at yahoo dot com
-- What|Removed |Added CC||funtoos at yahoo dot com http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1031 --- You are receiving th

[Bug ld/1031] linker errors on solaris10 (symbol versioning?)

2005-07-01 Thread funtoos at yahoo dot com
--- Additional Comments From funtoos at yahoo dot com 2005-07-01 21:52 --- I hit this error in openssl with gcc 4 and binutils 2.16.1: ../libcrypto.so: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' ../libcrypto.so: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' ../libcrypto.so: undefined referen

[Bug ld/1031] linker errors on solaris10 (symbol versioning?)

2005-07-01 Thread funtoos at yahoo dot com
--- Additional Comments From funtoos at yahoo dot com 2005-07-01 20:56 --- oops, sorry. a similar problem was resolved with this fix. -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1031 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, o

[Bug binutils/995] strip fails on archive with mixed files

2005-07-01 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-07-01 16:37 --- It is fixed by http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-06/msg00338.html -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug ld/1040] Many packages fail to compile with binutils 2.16.1 because of ldscripts screwup

2005-07-01 Thread funtoos at yahoo dot com
--- Additional Comments From funtoos at yahoo dot com 2005-07-01 14:17 --- latest opensolaris bits are 2.11 already. the binutils was configured and built using portage ebuilds. these are the configure args (I don't see much in them pointing to this error, although you are better judge):

Re: linker seg fault

2005-07-01 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:00:41PM +0100, Will Wagner wrote: > We are using ld version 2.14. I have attached a simple test case that > exhibits the error. I'm guessing that there is some error with the > options I'm passing to gcc, but ld just falling over doesn't make > debugging easy. > > Can

[Bug ld/1040] Many packages fail to compile with binutils 2.16.1 because of ldscripts screwup

2005-07-01 Thread drow at false dot org
--- Additional Comments From drow at false dot org 2005-07-01 13:44 --- Subject: Re: New: Many packages fail to compile with binutils 2.16.1 because of ldscripts screwup On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 04:40:07AM -, funtoos at yahoo dot com wrote: > With binutils 2.16.1, lots of packages f

[Bug gas/1036] gas macro handling broken after changes from 2005-05-17

2005-07-01 Thread schwab at suse dot de
-- What|Removed |Added CC||schwab at suse dot de http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1036 --- You are receiving this

[Bug ld/1031] linker errors on solaris10 (symbol versioning?)

2005-07-01 Thread niki dot waibel at newlogic dot com
--- Additional Comments From niki dot waibel at newlogic dot com 2005-07-01 12:31 --- hmmm, libtool is *not* used when building openssl. -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1031 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug