On 2025-04-07 22:34, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 4/4/25 4:18 PM, Jens Schmidt wrote:
>
>> [bashbug output manually adapted to real version ...]
>> Bash Version: 5.3
>> Commit: a6767763de5e7859107711b166a64a9e4a77a8ae
>> Release Status: compiled from recent devel branch
>>
>>
>> Description:
>> Bash
I've not been around this mailing list all too long, so I don't know if
this has been debated before, but I have always attempted to avoid
using external programs where functionality within bash can meet a
requirement. Doing this allows my scripts to be more reliable, and not
depend on those exter
one small addition , <<'foo' ( with quotes is used ) ..
.. should tell bash expliciply preserve data ..
On Mon, Apr 7, 2025, 23:51 microsuxx wrote:
> i dunno what lithist is , but remaining data one to one is a big bug thats
> gotta be fixed
> its like u write foo "$1" "$2" and it sends foo $1 $
Thank you for your answer.
2025年4月8日(火) 0:40 Chet Ramey :
> OK, so you're asking for a new feature/behavior change.
Yes.
> don't get me wrong, but it's a little late in the cycle for bash-5.3.
Yeah, that makes sense. I don't mind if the change would be applied in
a later version.
> > I'd be ha
On 4/5/25 5:37 PM, Koichi Murase wrote:
With nounset, ${#a[@]} for a scalar variable fails even though we can
correctly obtain the result (which is consistent with the expansion of
"${a[@]}") without nounset. This is the result with the devel
version:
$ bash -c 'a=1; echo ${#a[@]}'
1
$
