On 6/5/24 2:59 AM, Léa Gris wrote:
Le 05/06/2024 à 17:09, Koichi Murase écrivait :
2024年6月5日(水) 21:41 Zachary Santer :
Bash could potentially detect floating point literals within
arithmetic expansions and adjust the operations to use floating point
math in that case. [...]
ksh and zsh are al
Hi,
I am running bash 5.2.15(3)-release (x86_64-pc-cygwin) on
cygwin running on Windows 10.
Bash lacks a proper way of echoing commands, which is
present in other shells, even in ones which are much less
powerful, like, e.g. Windows CMD.
This is not the same as debugging, for which set -x is devo
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 07:31:13PM +0200, Angelo Borsotti wrote:
> "set -x" makes the ensuing commands be printed, but prefixed
> with "+ ", which makes the result look ugly, not to mention that
> the following "set +x" is echoed too (there are hacks to suppress
> the "set +x" output, but they are
~ $ logf=$HOME/alog1 ; run1() { printf '%(%F+%T%z)T %s' -1 "$1" >>"$logf" ;
(( $# > 1 )) && printf \ %s "${@:2}" >>"$logf" ; "$@" ; >>"$logf" printf
\\n ; } ; run1 echo foo ; cat "$logf"
foo
2024-06-12+22:51:31+0200 echo foo
~ $
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024, 10:26 PM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1
~ $ args1() { printf %s\ "${@@K}" ; printf \\n ; } ; args1 echo foo ;
args1 echo two three 'echo' 'foo'
'echo' 'two' 'three'
~ $
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024, 10:52 PM alex xmb sw ratchev
wrote:
> ~ $ logf=$HOME/alog1 ; run1() { printf '%(%F+%T%z)T %s' -1 "$1" >>"$logf"
> ; (( $# > 1 )) && printf \ %
there are two output lines , for the two cmds , sorry gmail problem
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024, 10:57 PM alex xmb sw ratchev
wrote:
> ~ $ args1() { printf %s\ "${@@K}" ; printf \\n ; } ; args1 echo foo ;
> args1 echo two three 'echo' 'foo'
> 'echo' 'two' 'three'
> ~ $
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2024, 10:5
args1() { printf %s\ "${@@K}" ; printf \\n ; } ; args1 echo foo ; args1
echo two three
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024, 10:58 PM alex xmb sw ratchev
wrote:
> there are two output lines , for the two cmds , sorry gmail problem
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2024, 10:57 PM alex xmb sw ratchev
> wrote:
>
>> ~ $ args1(
On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 6:34 AM Léa Gris wrote:
>
> Le 06/06/2024 à 11:55, Koichi Murase écrivait :
>
> > Though, I see your point. It is inconvenient that we cannot pass the
> > results of arithmetic evaluations to the `printf' builtin. This
> > appears to be an issue of the printf builtin. I thin
2024年6月13日(木) 5:20 Angelo Borsotti :
> This is not the same as debugging, for which set -x is devoted.
> "set -x" makes the ensuing commands be printed, but prefixed
> with "+ ", which makes the result look ugly,
PS4= (as Greg has replied)
> not to mention that
> the following "set +x" is echoed
I think that we should go ahead and do it.
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024, 5:06 PM Zachary Santer wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 6:34 AM Léa Gris wrote:
> >
> > Le 06/06/2024 à 11:55, Koichi Murase écrivait :
> >
> > > Though, I see your point. It is inconvenient that we cannot pass the
> > > results of
Dear all,
thank you very much for your quick replies. The solution:
alias @echo-on='set -x'
alias @echo-off='{ set +x; } 2>/dev/null'
PS4=
Solves the problem, and relieves from writing "echo COMMAND" before each
command that should be shown.
-Angelo Borsotti
On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 at
11 matches
Mail list logo
