Re: [bug-bash] Bash-5.2 Patch 22

On 2024/01/14 13:34:06 -0500, Chet Ramey wrote: >BASH PATCH REPORT >= > > Bash-Release: 5.2 > Patch-ID: bash52-022 > > Bug-Reported-by: srobert...@peratonlabs.com > Bug-Reference-ID: > Bug-Reference-URL: > https:

Re: completion very slow with gigantic list

How about: Don't sort the list, or consider "lazy sorting" only the portion of the list that's going to be displayed. (I'd suggest using an incremental Quicksort, which can yield a sorted sublist in almost linear time. (I started working on this for my zcomp module until I realised it was already

Re: [bug-bash] Bash-5.2 Patch 22

On 1/16/24 4:00 AM, Dr. Werner Fink wrote: what is with the readline82-008, readline82-009, and readline82-010 patches? What about them? -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRUc...@cas

Re: [bug-bash] Bash-5.2 Patch 22

On 2024/01/16 09:27:19 -0500, Chet Ramey wrote: > On 1/16/24 4:00 AM, Dr. Werner Fink wrote: > > > what is with the readline82-008, readline82-009, and readline82-010 > > patches? > > What about them? Should those be part also of trhe bash52 patches as well? -- "Having a smoking section in a

Re: [bug-bash] Bash-5.2 Patch 22

On 1/16/24 10:09 AM, Dr. Werner Fink wrote: On 2024/01/16 09:27:19 -0500, Chet Ramey wrote: On 1/16/24 4:00 AM, Dr. Werner Fink wrote: what is with the readline82-008, readline82-009, and readline82-010 patches? What about them? Should those be part also of trhe bash52 patches as well? B

Re: Bash Bug - Incorrect Printing of Escaped Characters

Are you planning on releasing a patch for this? If you'd like me to try to prepare a patch, I'd appreciate some guidance around the various dequote_... functions in subst.c. Thanks! Best, Seth On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 1:03 PM Chet Ramey wrote: > On 12/25/23 5:00 PM, Seth Sabar wrote: > > Hi all,

Re: Bash Bug - Incorrect Printing of Escaped Characters

On Tue, Jan 16, 2024, 11:01 Seth Sabar wrote: > Are you planning on releasing a patch for this? If you'd like me to try to > prepare a patch, I'd appreciate some guidance around the various > dequote_... functions in subst.c. Thanks! > Hi Seth, Chet has committed a fix for this in the devel bran

Re: $((expr)) allows the hexadecimal constant "0x"

On 1/9/24 11:23 PM, Martin D Kealey wrote: On Tue, 12 Dec 2023, 05:56 Zachary Santer, > wrote: On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 9:26 AM Chet Ramey mailto:chet.ra...@case.edu>> wrote: > Part of the issue here is that distros -- Red Hat, at least -- never > upgrad

[Bug][Bash Posix] Inquiry about Contributing to the Project

Dear Bash Maintainers, I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to inquire about the possibility of contributing to your project. Recently, I discovered a potential bug in the 'bash --posix' terminal and I believe I have a fix that could resolve this issue. Before proceeding, I wanted

Re: $((expr)) allows the hexadecimal constant "0x"

On Tue, Jan 16, 2024, at 4:43 PM, Chet Ramey wrote: > On 1/9/24 11:23 PM, Martin D Kealey wrote: >> The words “Integer constants follow the C language >> definition, without suffixes or character constants” were not added to the >> manual until June 2019 in the Devel branch (as commit >> 48492ff

Re: [Bug][Bash Posix] Inquiry about Contributing to the Project

On Tue, Jan 16, 2024, at 7:11 PM, Emre Ulusoy wrote: > Recently, I discovered a potential bug in the 'bash --posix' terminal > and I believe I have a fix that could resolve this issue. Before > proceeding, I wanted to confirm if this is an open-source project where > external contributions via p