Hi,
Could you please take a look at attached bug.bash.
Maybe, not all math combinations were presented there or the test has
duplications somehow.
Here are results of several runs with test# as argument
*% bash --version*GNU bash, version 5.2.15(3)-release (x86_64-pc-cygwin)
Good test without
Hi Victor,
On Sun, 17 Sep 2023, at 8:59 PM, Victor Pasko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could you please take a look at attached bug.bash.
>
> Maybe, not all math combinations were presented there or the test has
> duplications somehow.
> Here are results of several runs with test# as argument
>
>
> *% bash --v
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023, 04:03 Kerin Millar wrote:
> Hi Victor,
>
> On Sun, 17 Sep 2023, at 8:59 PM, Victor Pasko wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could you please take a look at attached bug.bash.
> >
> > Maybe, not all math combinations were presented there or the test has
> > duplications somehow.
> > Here
On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 04:56:18 +0200
alex xmb ratchev wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023, 04:03 Kerin Millar wrote:
>
> > Hi Victor,
> >
> > On Sun, 17 Sep 2023, at 8:59 PM, Victor Pasko wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Could you please take a look at attached bug.bash.
> > >
> > > Maybe, not all math com