Well i considered this one done upstream.
Martin D Kealey wrote in
:
|On Sat, 9 Jul 2022, 02:08 Chet Ramey, wrote:
|> On 7/8/22 11:03 AM, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|>
|>> So you seem to use your own itoa, and here is (another) bash bug.
...
|>> In this hindsight bash should bail with syntax
On 7/8/22 5:05 PM, Robert Elz wrote:
Date:Fri, 8 Jul 2022 12:08:38 -0400
From:Chet Ramey
Message-ID:
| This is where folks like kre are going to argue.
Am I? I was keeping out of this one!
It was a different thread discussing the same subject where I saw
Hi Martin,
Long answer - my own view: The old 'errexit' logic was spec'ed many years
ago. As far as I can tell, it existed in bash 2.0, from 1996. I think
requirements/expectations are different now. The 'exit on error' error
handling was good for 1996 - does not meet today's requirement - using b
