On 28/03/2022 22:00, Greg Wooledge wrote:
Or -- and I know this answer will be rejected, because it's too simple
and sensible -- stop using aliases in scripts.
+1
Or could just stop answering questions about aliases in scripts
--
Chris Elvidge
England
ignorance priest ?
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022, 14:27 Chris Elvidge wrote:
> On 28/03/2022 22:00, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> >
> > Or -- and I know this answer will be rejected, because it's too simple
> > and sensible -- stop using aliases in scripts.
> >
> >
>
> +1
>
> Or could just stop answering questi
> On Mar 29, 2022, at 8:26 AM, Chris Elvidge wrote:
>
> On 28/03/2022 22:00, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>> Or -- and I know this answer will be rejected, because it's too simple
>> and sensible -- stop using aliases in scripts.
>
> +1
>
> Or could just stop answering questions about aliases in script
your default of not allowing is weird
seems 'allowing alias foreworders to speak' not good to you ? its norma;
see peng
not one THANK YOU and still unfriendly
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 7:35 AM Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
> > On Mar 29, 2022, at 8:26 AM, Chris Elvidge
> wrote:
> >
> > On 28/03/2022
i do
wpa_supplicant -i"$if" -c<( printf %s\\n \
'network={' "ssid=\"$ssid\"" "psk=\"$pass\"" '}'
) &
{ sleep 3 ; dhclient "$if" ; } &
which is simply wpa_supplicant -iiface -c<( conf file printing )
it since years resuts in such : i think before it said printf defuncted
root 1528 0.0 0.
> On Mar 30, 2022, at 1:37 AM, Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev wrote:
>
> your default of not allowing is weird
>
> seems 'allowing alias foreworders to speak' not good to you ?
You're misrepresenting what I said and what Chris said. Read
messages more closely before you pop off.
--
vq
please dont take it overly, accept free speech, and the lack of perfection
thats there always everywhere anyway
i will not read headpaining dumbshitt again, but wished a few words
i motiv ate you to too, few words here few words there, ..
greets
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 7:47 AM Lawrence Velázquez
