thanks && cc list
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021, 15:04 Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 2/15/21 8:57 AM, Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev wrote:
> > i had yet a couple of trace msges, this one s new
> > any big meaning ?
>
> Nope, it's informational for me. You see it because you're running a
> debug version.
>
> --
> ``The l
On 2/14/21 6:27 PM, Daniel Gröber wrote:
Hi list,
I've found what I belive to be a bug in how `test -v` expands the key in an
associative array. The following minimal test case demonstrates the
problem:
declare -A array
mytest () {
array["$1"]=123
test
On 2/14/21 4:03 AM, Stephane Chazelas wrote:
2021-02-09 10:23:51 -0500, Chet Ramey:
[...]
It's the assignment statement that's the oddball here; it's the only place
where the exit status from a command substitution has any effect. This is a
POSIX (maybe ksh) invention to provide assignment state
On 2/12/21 8:20 PM, Koichi Murase wrote:
I personally don't use this particularly short timeout, but this shows
that the masked SIGCHLD is again another ``partial'' fix. Yesterday I
actually received an email from felix that he has
actually posted the same issue on the mailing list last October
On 2/13/21 5:21 PM, Robert Elz wrote:
| $ bash -c ': $(case x in x) esac)'
This is a well known bash deficiency. When parsing command substitutions
it (approximately) simply counts (unquoted) parentheses to find the end.
Anything with a valid closing ')' but with no opening '(' confuses
On 2/14/21 6:02 AM, Robert Elz wrote:
| I guess you are using Bash for so many years,
Yes, since Paul Fox created and maintained it (version 1). It allowed
me to escape from csh.
(It's Brian Fox.)
How long ago, and do you have any old source versions lying around? I'm
always trying to g
Hi Greg and Chet,
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 08:48:15AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Do it this way instead:
>
> unicorn:~$ mytest() { array[$1]=123; test -v 'array[$1]'; echo "$?"; }
Ah! I didn't know test would exand that '$1' in there, cool.
> Yours expands $1 first, then passes array["] as an
On 2/13/21 3:21 PM, Oğuz wrote:
$ bash -c ': $(case x in x) esac)'
bash: -c: line 1: unexpected EOF while looking for matching `)'
bash: -c: line 2: syntax error: unexpected end of file
`case x in x) esac' is a complete case command, a syntax error is
unexpected here.
It is unexpected
> On Feb 15, 2021, at 10:01 AM, Chet Ramey wrote:
>
> The bash command substitution parser handles the majority of these
> cases (heh)
lol I chuckled, well done
vq
On 2/15/21 4:35 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
On Feb 15, 2021, at 10:01 AM, Chet Ramey wrote:
The bash command substitution parser handles the majority of these
cases (heh)
lol I chuckled, well done
I'll be here all week.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
2021年2月16日(火) 5:12 Chet Ramey :
> It is unexpected, though the syntax is obscure. I'll fix it.
If this is to be fixed, maybe also the following cases could be
handled better (if the corresponding fixes are not too complicated).
bash -c ': $(case x in esac)'
bash -c ': $(case x in (x) if :; then e
On 2/15/21 5:39 PM, Koichi Murase wrote:
2021年2月16日(火) 5:12 Chet Ramey :
It is unexpected, though the syntax is obscure. I'll fix it.
If this is to be fixed, maybe also the following cases could be
handled better (if the corresponding fixes are not too complicated).
At some point, maybe. The
16 Şubat 2021 Salı tarihinde Koichi Murase yazdı:
>
> bash -c ': $(case x in esac)'
> bash -c ': $(case x in (x) if :; then echo a; fi esac)'
> bash -c ': $(case x in (x) a() { echo a; } esac)'
> bash -c ': $(case x in (x) for ((i=0;i<10;i++)) { echo a; } esac)'
> bash -c ': $(case x in (x) while
2021年2月16日(火) 13:29 Oğuz :
> 16 Şubat 2021 Salı tarihinde Koichi Murase yazdı:
>> bash -c ': $(case x in esac)'
>> bash -c ': $(case x in (x) if :; then echo a; fi esac)'
>> bash -c ': $(case x in (x) a() { echo a; } esac)'
>> bash -c ': $(case x in (x) for ((i=0;i<10;i++)) { echo a; } esac)'
>> b
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 8:34 AM Koichi Murase
wrote:
> Because the ending keywords---}, fi, done, and esac---are allowed to
> be chained, which I think is undocumented though.
>
> $ { { { { { echo "Something like this is allowed"; } } } } }
>
Huh. So a compound list consisting of a single compou
2021年2月16日(火) 13:56 Oğuz :
> $ if (:) then (:) fi
> $
>
> I had no idea.
Oh, I forgot about `(list)'. I should also add this to the list:
$ bash -c ': $(case x in (x) (echo a) esac)'
--
Koichi
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:27:42AM +0100, Daniel Gröber wrote:
> I've found what I belive to be a bug in how `test -v` expands the key in an
> associative array. The following minimal test case demonstrates the
> problem:
>
> declare -A array
>
> mytest () {
> array["$1"]=
i had yet a couple of trace msges, this one s new
any big meaning ?
On 2/15/21 8:57 AM, Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev wrote:
i had yet a couple of trace msges, this one s new
any big meaning ?
Nope, it's informational for me. You see it because you're running a
debug version.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, v
19 matches
Mail list logo
