2021-02-12 19:33:33 -0700, ron:
> In the Synopsis section, the builtin `caller` is not included. Several
> keywords are listed as builtins: [, if, until and while.
You're probably refering to the bash-builtins.1 man page shipped
with Debian. If you look at the bottom, you'll see that man page
is f
2021年2月14日(日) 15:41 Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri :
> And using (x) doesn't help:
>
> % bash -c ': $(case x in (x) esac)'
> bash: -c: line 1: unexpected EOF while looking for matching `)'
> bash: -c: line 2: syntax error: unexpected end of file
This is interesting. I think this is just an oversight.
2021-02-09 10:23:51 -0500, Chet Ramey:
[...]
> It's the assignment statement that's the oddball here; it's the only place
> where the exit status from a command substitution has any effect. This is a
> POSIX (maybe ksh) invention to provide assignment statements with a useful
> exit status.
[...]
14 Şubat 2021 Pazar tarihinde Koichi Murase yazdı:
> 2021年2月14日(日) 15:41 Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri :
> > And using (x) doesn't help:
> >
> > % bash -c ': $(case x in (x) esac)'
> > bash: -c: line 1: unexpected EOF while looking for matching `)'
> > bash: -c: line 2: syntax error: unexpected end
2021年2月14日(日) 17:16 Oğuz :
>> This is interesting. I think this is just an oversight. A quick fix
>> like the attached patch should be fine. [ Note: The patch seems to
>> work fine, but I haven't carefully read the code, so I'm not sure if
>> this fix is really correct. ]
>
> It seems to be on the
Date:Sun, 14 Feb 2021 17:00:06 +0800
From:Koichi Murase
Message-ID:
| I guess you are using Bash for so many years,
Yes, since Paul Fox created and maintained it (version 1). It allowed
me to escape from csh.
| but it was fixed in Bash 4.0 (2009).
That is
2021-02-14 18:02:52 +0700, Robert Elz:
[...]
> | I guess you are using Bash for so many years,
>
> Yes, since Paul Fox created and maintained it (version 1). It allowed
> me to escape from csh.
ITYM Brian Fox. Maybe the confusion comes from zsh's Paul
Falstad.
--
Stephane
Date:Sun, 14 Feb 2021 13:14:29 +
From:Stephane Chazelas
Message-ID: <20210214131429.yxr5egs7zs6fe...@chazelas.org>
| ITYM Brian Fox.
Yes, probably ... my memory is pathetic, and that was all a
long time ago.
kre
14 Şubat 2021 Pazar tarihinde Robert Elz yazdı:
>
> That's a step up on outright rejecting them, which they do from time
> to time. I don't much care, anyone who really cares about receiving
> e-mail shouldn't be using gmail.
>
What else am I gonna use? It's free
--
Oğuz
Before we worry about what to change, I want to note that the original
example is syntactically incorrect. The example is
$ bash -c ': $(case x in x) esac)'
But the manual page makes it clear that each case must be ended with
";;".
case word in [ [(] pattern [ | pattern ] ... ) list ;;
14 Şubat 2021 Pazar tarihinde Dale R. Worley yazdı:
> Before we worry about what to change, I want to note that the original
> example is syntactically incorrect. The example is
>
> $ bash -c ': $(case x in x) esac)'
>
> But the manual page makes it clear that each case must be ended with
> ";
On 2/14/21 2:43 PM, Dale R. Worley wrote:
> Before we worry about what to change, I want to note that the original
> example is syntactically incorrect. The example is
>
> $ bash -c ': $(case x in x) esac)'
>
> But the manual page makes it clear that each case must be ended with
> ";;".
>
>
> On Feb 14, 2021, at 3:00 PM, Oğuz wrote:
>
> 14 Şubat 2021 Pazar tarihinde Dale R. Worley yazdı:
>
>> Before we worry about what to change, I want to note that the original
>> example is syntactically incorrect. The example is
>>
>> $ bash -c ': $(case x in x) esac)'
>>
>> But the manual
On Feb 14 2021, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> Just a running trend that esac does not get recognized without a
> separator.
$ bash -c 'case x in x) esac'
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something co
On 2/14/21 3:35 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Feb 14 2021, Eli Schwartz wrote:
>
>> Just a running trend that esac does not get recognized without a
>> separator.
>
> $ bash -c 'case x in x) esac'
The thread title does mention $(...) as the relevant context up for
discussion. Apologies if my te
On Feb 14 2021, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> On 2/14/21 3:35 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> On Feb 14 2021, Eli Schwartz wrote:
>>
>>> Just a running trend that esac does not get recognized without a
>>> separator.
>>
>> $ bash -c 'case x in x) esac'
>
> The thread title does mention $(...) as the releva
Hi list,
I've found what I belive to be a bug in how `test -v` expands the key in an
associative array. The following minimal test case demonstrates the
problem:
declare -A array
mytest () {
array["$1"]=123
test -v array["$1"]
printf 'test -v array
17 matches
Mail list logo
