On 6/17/19 9:30 AM, Jeremy Townshend wrote:
> Ilkka Virta's email helpfully pointed me to a somewhat related debate that
> occurred about 11 months ago. I agree with your comment in this debate:
>
> "There would be a good case for rejecting the '10#' because it's missing
> the value."
I'll
On 6/18/19 12:13 PM, Ilkka Virta wrote:
> On 18.6. 18:20, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 10:27:48AM -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
>>> $ ksh93 -c 'echo ${.sh.version}'
>>> Version ABIJM 93v- 2014-09-29
>>> $ ksh93 -c 'echo $(( 10# ))'
>>> ksh93: 10# : arithmetic syntax error
>>
>> I gue
On 6/18/19 11:20 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Seems kinda weird to continue calling it "ksh93" if it's being changed,
> but I don't make the decisions.
Korn once explained it as the "ksh93 language definition." So there are
multiple implementations of that language.
--
``The lyf so short, the cra
Hi Everyone,
I have a systemd service that automatically applies updates. Looking
at the service history, the service reports failure when it installs
updates due to this:
if dnf -y update &>/dev/null
then
echo "Upgraded system"
else
echo "Failed to upgrade system"
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 11:01:46AM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> if dnf -y update &>/dev/null
> then
> echo "Upgraded system"
> else
> echo "Failed to upgrade system"
> exit 1
> fi
>
> The problems seems to be 0, 100 and 200 are success. When updates are
>
On 6/19/19 11:01 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I have a systemd service that automatically applies updates. Looking
> at the service history, the service reports failure when it installs
> updates due to this:
>
> if dnf -y update &>/dev/null
> then
> echo "Upgraded
