On 7/27/18 7:13 PM, konsolebox wrote:
> Hi Chet,
>
> I wonder if you can allow bash to have another syntax to allow simpler
> declaration and/or definition of associative arrays. The changes
> needed to have it done seem simple enough, and the only conflict it
> makes is a scalar `var={...` assig
On 7/29/18 10:26 PM, Grisha Levit wrote:
> Though my motivation in reporting this was to point out the segfault, I'm a
> bit confused by why compound assignment should be an error here.
>
>> Bash is consistent in defaulting to indexed array variables when you don't
>> specify -A and assign a value
On 7/25/18 2:48 PM, Michal Pesa wrote:
> It would be obvious then what color exactly needs to be change in the
> LS_COLORS variable if a different color was desired.
I don't see setting the color in stone as helping the user experience.
It's the same color as sockets right now, since that's unlike
That's exactly what I would welcome in the manual. Something as simple
as: The socket color "so" of the LS_COLORS variable is used as the
prefix color.
Regards.
On 7/31/2018 5:09 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
On 7/25/18 2:48 PM, Michal Pesa wrote:
It would be obvious then what color exactly needs t
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 10:31 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 7/27/18 7:13 PM, konsolebox wrote:
>> Hi Chet,
>>
>> I wonder if you can allow bash to have another syntax to allow simpler
>> declaration and/or definition of associative arrays. The changes
>> needed to have it done seem simple enough, an
