On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 Greg Wooledge wrote:
"For starters, make is *older* than bash, by over a decade.
"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Make_%28software%29 says that make
originated at Bell Labs in April 1976.
"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bash_%28Unix_shell%29 says that the first
"beta version of ba
Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
Machine: x86_64
OS: linux-gnu
Compiler: gcc
Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='x86_64'
-DCONF_OSTYPE='linux-gnu' -DCONF_MACHTYPE='x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu'
-DCONF_VENDOR='unknown' -DLOCALEDIR='/usr/share/loca
On Dez 03 2016, "Ravi (Tom) Hale" wrote:
> Description:
>
> Given a filename called ':example'
> When the user enters 'command :' and hits
> Then the completion of the filename gets a doubled colon, specifically:
> ':\:example'
Make sure you don't have any custom completion functio
On 12/3/16 6:41 AM, Ravi (Tom) Hale wrote:
> Bash Version: 4.4
> Patch Level: 5
> Release Status: release
>
>
> Description:
>
> Given a filename called ':example'
> When the user enters 'command :' and hits
> Then the completion of the filename gets a doubled colon, specifically:
"build market"? What are you talking about? make was created with the
sole purpose of build automation. The shell was created to provide a
"human interface" to computer operators. These are very specific and
different purposes. Are you going to start asking next to re-implement
vi inside bash? to r
On 12/2/16 6:23 AM, parasite parasite wrote:
> GNU bash, version 4.3.46(1)-release (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
> GCC: (GNU) 6.1.1
> On archlinux 4.4.27-1-lts
>
> Hello, today i tried something simple but it leads to what seems to be a bug.
>
> $ var="$(for ((i=0;i<$#;i++));do echo line;done)"
> le
On 12/1/16 5:44 PM, Vladimir Marek wrote:
> Because of this setting the tests are failing. I am attaching a patch we
> are using for workaround to show where the problems are seen. I used
> 'echo -E' when investigating, but "printf '%s\n'" seems to be more
> appropriate. If there is interest I'm m
On 12/2/16 6:07 AM, Vladimir Marek wrote:
> And second patch we use because of xpg-echo. Would it have sense to have
> it included, or maybe stop the tests completely instead?
You could just have turned off the xpg_echo option instead of going through
a convoluted test (which just emulates `shopt
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Eduardo Bustamante
wrote:
> "build market"? What are you talking about? make was created with the
> sole purpose of build automation. The shell was created to provide a
> "human interface" to computer operators. These are very specific and
> different purposes. Ar
Hi,
upgraded bash from
GNU bash, version *4.3.30(1)-release* (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
to *4.4.5(1)-release* and noticed the *readonly* array variables fail to be
defined with init values.
See sample snippet:
o() {
local i j
readonly i=($1)
readonly j=(1 2 3)
echo "passed args expande
10 matches
Mail list logo
