Re: IGNOREEOF and POSIXLY_CORRECT don't ignore invisible vars

2016-06-18 Thread Linda Walsh
Grisha Levit wrote: The manual references these values being set, not just declared, so maybe should check for invisible_p? --- Why? I.e. what were you wanting to happen? Noticeable for example because this works: $ set +o posix; f() { local POSIXLY_CORRECT=; shopt -p -o posix; }; f;

Re: Mulit-line aliases and PROMPT_COMMAND

2016-06-18 Thread Linda Walsh
Dan Douglas wrote: The 4.4 changes will make aliases even more interesting. --- Oh? Why is that? I.e. what's happening to aliases that will make them more "interesting"? BTW, are you using "interesting" in the same way as the saying "May you live in interesting times"?