> Chet can give the definitive answer, but my take is that it's a huge
> surprise to someone writing a function independent of the script, or
> using a function that was written independently of the script. If the
> function does not expect set -e to be in effect (which is not the default,
> and i
On 10/2/15 9:22 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 03:53:42PM +0300, Christoph Gysin wrote:
>> I'm still curious as to why set -e is stripped in the first place?
>
> Chet can give the definitive answer, but my take is that it's a huge
> surprise to someone writing a function indepe
