> > > a) decreasing size of the 'bgpids' list. Why do we need 30k entries if
> > > we don't trust that the IDs are unique? Maybe configuration or runtime
> > > option?
> >
> > I've thought about it. Posix only requires saving the statuses of the last
> > CHILD_MAX asynchronous pids. The bash cod
BASH PATCH REPORT
=
Bash-Release: 4.3
Patch-ID: bash43-034
Bug-Reported-by:Dreamcat4
Bug-Reference-ID:
Bug-Reference-URL:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2015-05/msg1.html
Bug-
BASH PATCH REPORT
=
Bash-Release: 4.3
Patch-ID: bash43-035
Bug-Reported-by:
Bug-Reference-ID:
Bug-Reference-URL:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2014-08/msg00045.html
Bug-Descriptio
BASH PATCH REPORT
=
Bash-Release: 4.3
Patch-ID: bash43-036
Bug-Reported-by:emanuelczi...@cryptolab.net
Bug-Reference-ID:
Bug-Reference-URL:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2015-02/msg
BASH PATCH REPORT
=
Bash-Release: 4.3
Patch-ID: bash43-038
Bug-Reported-by:wor...@alum.mit.edu (Dale R. Worley)
Bug-Reference-ID: <201406100051.s5a0pceb014...@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
Bug-Reference-URL:
BASH PATCH REPORT
=
Bash-Release: 4.3
Patch-ID: bash43-037
Bug-Reported-by:Greg Wooledge
Bug-Reference-ID: <20150204144240.gn13...@eeg.ccf.org>
Bug-Reference-URL:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/ht
BASH PATCH REPORT
=
Bash-Release: 4.3
Patch-ID: bash43-039
Bug-Reported-by:SN
Bug-Reference-ID: <54e2554c@gazeta.pl>
Bug-Reference-URL:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2015-02/msg
