Chet Ramey writes:
> On 4/19/15 2:00 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> The config.h.in file in the standalone readline distribution is missing
>> a lot of templates. It should really be generated by autoheader.
>>
>> --- readline-6.3/config.h.in.~1~ 2012-01-18 16:22:13.0 +0100
>> +++ rea
On 4/20/15 2:59 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>> +#undef __EXTENSIONS__
>>> +#undef _ALL_SOURCE
>>> +#undef _GNU_SOURCE
>>> +#undef _POSIX_SOURCE
>>> +#undef _POSIX_1_SOURCE
>>> +#undef _POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS
>>> +#undef _TANDEM_SOURCE
>>> +
>>
>> Readline configure.ac doesn't call AC_USE_SYSTEM_EX
On 4/19/15 10:38 PM, Peng Yu wrote:
>> That's the difference: if you're careful with naming and rigorous about
>> your calling conventions, your one-time-use functions are about as close
>> as you can get to local functions in bash, but you have to pay attention
>> to the declaration's side effect
Hi Chet,
>>> That's the difference: if you're careful with naming and rigorous about
>>> your calling conventions, your one-time-use functions are about as close
>>> as you can get to local functions in bash, but you have to pay attention
>>> to the declaration's side effects.
>>
>> There is at le
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 03:04:00PM -0500, Peng Yu wrote:
> Hi Chet,
> > I disagree that performance overhead in typical use is `significant'.
> > This point is more or less identical to the one I discussed Friday in
> > regards to creating huge numbers of variables. Who creates 100,000
> > shell f
On 4/19/15, 5:24 PM, "Chet Ramey" wrote:
>On 4/17/15 4:55 PM, John Fremlin wrote:
>> Did some benchmarks, for the while true; do (:) & (:); done simple
>>example
>> this goes from 215 to 313 iterations/s, and changes sys+user CPU from
>>152%
>> to 45%
>>
>> Any long running bash script will tend
Hi everyone,
While testing an awk script and piping the script to a command the
following seem to occur. Not sure if this is even a bash problem. Here are
some details about my configuration:
$ echo "$BASH_VERSION"
4.3.33(1)-release
The file called 'history' contains the following code
$ cat hi
On 4/20/15 4:04 PM, Peng Yu wrote:
>> I disagree that performance overhead in typical use is `significant'.
>> This point is more or less identical to the one I discussed Friday in
>> regards to creating huge numbers of variables. Who creates 100,000
>> shell functions in a single script? The ov
On 4/20/15 5:01 PM, Valentin Bajrami wrote:
> Now when running ./history | his where his is not an existing command it
> fails and adds an entry in the job list.
>
> $ ./history | his
>
> [2]+ Stopped ./history | his
> bash: his: command not found...
>
>
> Running twice the o
Hi Chet,
I see. But how would I avoid this? Using Fedora 21 here and my
command_not_found_handle() is
command_not_found_handle ()
{
local runcnf=1;
local retval=127;
[[ $- =~ i ]] || runcnf=0;
[ ! -S /var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket ] && runcnf=0;
[ ! -x /usr/libexec/packageki
On 4/20/15 5:24 PM, Valentin Bajrami wrote:
> Hi Chet,
>
> I see. But how would I avoid this? Using Fedora 21 here and my
> command_not_found_handle() is
It's hard to say without knowing what pk-command-not-found does. What
does this do when you just run `his' from the command line and let it
e
11 matches
Mail list logo
