Re: Please accept M-p as well as C-p

2014-02-14 Thread Andreas Schwab
Bob Proulx writes: > In emacs 24 this is the new feature controlled by the line-move-visual > variable. Call me a Luddite if you want but in emacs 24 I turn that > feature off. I am very much "used to using" the traditional behavior > and like it. I do as well. > Thinking about it I think tha

Re: Browsing the history of commands. Inconsistency between Bash and Emacs

2014-02-14 Thread Dani Moncayo
> This is completely putting the cart before the horse. And going down > that road creates a circular line of reasoning which has no end to the > loop cycle. Plus it is a radical change in fundamental behavior. > Please don't. I disagree with the above, obviously. See below. > The entire reaso

Re: Browsing the history of commands. Inconsistency between Bash and Emacs

2014-02-14 Thread Dani Moncayo
> I said in an earlier message that the two programs use different mental > models. Here's what I meant. Currently they are different, indeed, but I think it would be perfectly possible, and desirable, to remove that inconsistency. > Readline is one-dimensional: everything it deals with is a lin

Re: Browsing the history of commands. Inconsistency between Bash and Emacs

2014-02-14 Thread Dani Moncayo
>> The use of C-p and C-n for this is pervasive and long-lived. There is >> no reason to break 25 years of backwards compatibility and compatibility >> with other shells to make this change. > > I thought that compatibility with GNU Emacs was important too. > Perhaps the proposed (Emacs-compatib