On 02/18/2013 02:39 AM, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 2/17/13 7:46 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>
I notice the following will wait for 5 seconds for
the timeout process to end with SIGALRM, rather than
immediately due to kill sending the SIGTERM.
>>>
>>> I think the way to approach this is to
On 3/25/13 10:34 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> I've confirmed that bash 4.3 alpha doesn't have the issue.
> Well I can't reproduce easily at least.
> I didn't notice a NEWS item corresponding to it though.
It's not a new feature. There are several items in CHANGES that refer to
reworked signal hand
On 03/25/2013 02:55 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 3/25/13 10:34 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>
>> I've confirmed that bash 4.3 alpha doesn't have the issue.
>> Well I can't reproduce easily at least.
>> I didn't notice a NEWS item corresponding to it though.
>
> It's not a new feature. There are severa
Hello,
$ function f { typeset +x x; typeset x=123; echo "$x"; sh -c 'echo "$x"';
}; x=abc f
123
abc
$ echo "$BASH_VERSION"
4.2.45(1)-release
This is inconsistent with a variable defined and exported any other way.
(ksh93/mksh/zsh don't have this issue. Dash doesn't actually
Hi,
$ set -x; foo=bar declare arr=( {1..10} )
+ foo=bar
+ declare 'a=(1)' 'a=(2)' 'a=(3)' 'a=(4)' 'a=(5)'
$ touch xy=foo
$ declare x[y]=*
+ declare 'x[y]=*'
$ foo=bar declare x[y]=*
+ foo=bar
+ declare xy=foo
This isn't the same bug as the earlier a=([n]=*) i
Hello,
1. Process substitution within array indices.
The difference between (( 1<(2) )) and (( a[1<(2)] )) might be seen as
surprising.
Zsh and ksh don't do this in any arithmetic context AFAICT.
Fun stuff:
# print "moo"
dev=fd=1 _[1<(echo moo >&2)]=
# Fork bomb
