Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Honestly, a "restricted shell" is usually a pitiful thing that would be
> a joke, except it's not even funny.
>
> I have no idea what the POSIX standard has to do with your question,
> though.
-
Chet answered this in context:
Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 3/14/13 2:5
Linda Walsh wrote:
> Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > Honestly, a "restricted shell" is usually a pitiful thing that would be
> > a joke, except it's not even funny.
> Chet answered this in context:
> Chet Ramey wrote:
> > Posix has chosen not to standardize the restricted shell, either `rsh' or
>
