On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:52:54PM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote:
> Sorta makes the idea of a restricted shell a bit less useful.
Honestly, a "restricted shell" is usually a pitiful thing that would be
a joke, except it's not even funny. It's what people tried to use for
security back in like 1990 whe
On 3/14/13 2:52 AM, Linda Walsh wrote:
>
>
> Chet Ramey wrote:
>> The default bash behavior and the SuSE modification are both conformant.
>
> Is 'rbash' not part of POSIX?
Posix has chosen not to standardize the restricted shell, either `rsh' or
`set -r'.
--
``The lyf so short, th
On 3/13/13 5:17 PM, Matthew Riley wrote:
> ...
> nlen = nend - ntail;
> memcpy (nbeg, ntail, nlen);
> nbeg[nlen] = '\0';
>
> return name;
> ...
>
> [nbeg, nbeg+nlen) and [ntail, ntail+nlen) can overlap, so this code should
> use memmove. I'm pretty sure this explains why sometimes using
>
