ignoring current shell and always running posix shell? Re: Should this be this way?

2013-03-11 Thread Linda Walsh
Pierre Gaston wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Roman Rakus wrote: >> I think the line above will produce unspecified behavior. > Man bash says: > If this execution fails because the file is not in executable > format, and the file is not a directory, it is assumed to be a shell > scr

Re: ignoring current shell and always running posix shell? Re: Should this be this way?

2013-03-11 Thread Pierre Gaston
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Linda Walsh wrote: > Pierre Gaston wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Roman Rakus wrote: >>> I think the line above will produce unspecified behavior. > >> Man bash says: >> If this execution fails because the file is not in executable >> format, and t

Re: ignoring current shell and always running posix shell? Re: Should this be this way?

2013-03-11 Thread Linda Walsh
Pierre Gaston wrote: >> >> >> It is likely that the document is assuming you are running on >> a POSIX compliant system where all users use the same shell so there is >> only 1 shell, thus the use of the word 'the' when referring to the shell. >> > Of course, it's the posix specificati