Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 18:03:13 -0500
> Von: Dan Douglas
> An: bug-bash@gnu.org
> CC: Rainer Blome
Remember that my main suggestion is to clearly document the intended
behavior (see the subject). This could mean to add a generic
paragraph to the documentat
On 07/04/2012 09:37 AM, Rainer Blome wrote:
>
> * Different POSIX shell implementations are free to behave
> differently, because the behavior is not specified exactly.
Actually, that's where you are wrong. POSIX _does_ specify bash's
current behavior (in fact, bash changed behavior to match PO
Thanks for pointing me to that issue report.
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 10:47:11 -0600
> Von: Eric Blake
> An: Rainer Blome
> CC: Dan Douglas , bug-bash@gnu.org
> On 07/04/2012 09:37 AM, Rainer Blome wrote:
> > * Different POSIX shell implementations are free
On 07/04/2012 12:03 PM, Rainer Blome wrote:
> Thanks for pointing me to that issue report.
>
>>> * Different POSIX shell implementations are free to behave
>>> differently, because the behavior is not specified exactly.
>>> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/set.html
>> Actu
