On 15 Apr 2012, at 22:52, Linda Walsh wrote:
>
> But I want the syntax
>
> include file.shh
>
> to just 'work', i.e. first time, it would call my include file, which defines
> the function...
I'm sorry, tell me again why you don't just write "source file.sh" instead of
having to invent your ow
On 16 Apr 2012, at 09:54, Maarten Billemont wrote:
> On 15 Apr 2012, at 22:52, Linda Walsh wrote:
>>
>> But I want the syntax
>>
>> include file.shh
>>
>> to just 'work', i.e. first time, it would call my include file, which defines
>> the function...
>
> I'm sorry, tell me again why you don't
I have found one more problem:
I'm getting following:
bash -c 'printf "x%+fx\n" -0'
x+0.00x
where it should be:
x-0.00x
This is cause by:
/* round off to the precision */
#define ROUND(d, p) \
(d < 0.) ? \
d - pow_10(-(p)->precision) * 0.5 : \
d +
Maarten Billemont wrote:
On 16 Apr 2012, at 09:54, Maarten Billemont wrote:
On 15 Apr 2012, at 22:52, Linda Walsh wrote:
But I want the syntax
include file.shh
to just 'work', i.e. first time, it would call my include file, which defines
the function...
I'm sorry, tell me again why you do
On 16 Apr 2012, at 11:43, Linda Walsh wrote:
>
>
> But it won't work for files below the top level of the library directory.
>
> if I have include system/errno.shh, Source is crippled to not look in PATH.
When there's a slash in the file, it stops searching PATH.
So the reason you're not doi
Maarten Billemont wrote:
On 16 Apr 2012, at 11:43, Linda Walsh wrote:
But it won't work for files below the top level of the library directory.
if I have include system/errno.shh, Source is crippled to not look in PATH.
When there's a slash in the file, it stops searching PATH.
So the